Blog
Podcast
Comments
The IT Skeptic's ITIL News
ITIL out of the box
Dear Skep, A friend of mine works at an organisation that is migrating from one tier-1 ITIL tool vendor to another tier-1 ITIL tool vendor. They have been assured that they can adopt ITIL compliant processes out of the box using their toolset and are starting with Incident, Problem, Change, Service Catalogue, Request Fulfilment, Configuration and Service Level Management. The vendor also sold a project manager and a technical guy for implementation. It all seems too easy. What could possibly go wrong? Thanks in advance. Dear Nervous You should relax. Nothing can go wrong here. Look at all the things you have on your side ... um.. I mean your friend has on their side:
Yup. When you hand your ITSM journey over to the software vendor you put yourself in safe hands. Of course none of this applies to the tier-1 vendor that you are ...er... I mean your friend is migrating away from. Clearly the outgoing vendor had deficient non-ITIL-compliant technology and hopeless implementation skills, otherwise why would you be going from one to another? It must be their fault that you haven't already achieved ITIL nirvana. Please be aware that The ITIL Wizard is satire. It is not meant to be taken seriously, it should not be used as advice on ITIL or anything else. He is frequently wrong (though occasionally alarmingly right). |









Made in New Zealand 
Comments
non-ITIL compliant technology
Yes, I am 95% certain that I know the tool you are mentioning implements less than 25% of the first two books (Service Strategy and Service Design). Once the project was complete... the vendor went on to evangelize that they can implement ITIL in 4 weeks or less with case studies and speaking engagements.
case studies and speaking engagements
Vendor Conferences
[IMG]http://i47.tinypic.com/2ah8y11.jpg[/IMG]
I guess you don't allow image replies...
I do to registered readers :)
I do to registered readers :)
Juxtaposition
I was reading your main blog page and saw an ad by N*mera asking if I wanted to replace my expensive Service Desk tool. Then I read this article. Hmm...
swapping one tool for another
I agree. There is seldom any reason to swap one tool for another. It's usually a bad idea from a bad manager.
Even if it is cheaper, the true total cost of changing usually far exceeds any licence savings.
Even if the vendor screwed you, don't delude yourself the others will be any better, and don't spend your employer's money to get even.
Don't pretend it's better. It is rare for a tool to really do something that its competitors don't, especially in the mature markets that we generally deal with: service desk, security, monitoring, asset, operations... Service catalogue tools - I dunno, don't know enough of them well enough to say how they stack up. It is even rarer for that difference to really truly matter to your business (as compared to feature envy).
I'd swap if local support (including third party) for the incumbent tool truly sucked, or the product was retired, AND the resulting risk exceeded some threshold AND all the impacted processes were already mature/optimised to a useful level AND the team rocked. If the culture and processes are broken, don't waste your time and money fiddling with tools.
In the words of Ralph Wiggum
In the words of the immortal Ralph Wigum,
"That's funny, but not ha-ha funny".