|
Skep's Pick: The IT Skeptic Awards for 2008 This link is here because...(hover) itSMF can be forgiven a little shaky governance
Blog entry submitted by skeptic
on Sat, 2007-06-23 11:21. [nid:259] in
I guess ISACA are the governance gurus and itSMF can be forgiven a little shaky governance right? Why should every chapter bother with published accounts? In a tough year, of course an international team needs to meet face to face every quarter – there is only so much you can do with teleconferencing. Is there a best practice for a Board to extend its tenure, or even try to avoid elections entirely? And what’s a wobbly election process between friends? Who’s to say what is a reasonable vendor presence anyway. Why shouldn’t itSMF Board members be paid consulting fees by the same body? It’s cool if board and committees resign en masse then factions fight it out for control without a formal board dissolution. It’s not as if the world looks up to itSMF for governance leadership or anything, right? That’s ISACA. We’re the process people. Just look at our processes. Buy your books here to support this blog: |
Blog




















Got a tricky question about ITIL?
Made in New Zealand 
Recent comments