Who's new |
|
Recent commentsMultiple Causation JamesFinister The expanded incident lifecycle Red Pineapple Pink Elephant says not Cary King The need for thought JamesFinister Reminds me... Red Pineapple Thank you.
However, now you Michiel Yes I removed it skeptic Problem Management Michiel Survive-now.com Michiel A few questions / challenges Red Pineapple What's unique? kengon One small correction ITIL citizen all this "serving" stuff skeptic Whose problem is it anyway? kengon Trademarks depend on trade Amused Failure usually is an option skeptic Sorry about the captchas skeptic Examples IT Governance Blog Thanks of post... Xrumer and what about "The Risks Digest"? Red Pineapple she's still down there skeptic It figures... kengon Compare with IBM Cary King ITIL v3 - SLM compared to CSI Matt Craig HP using BMC Atrium Peter Lijnse She's gone skeptic Reverse takeover of C&W by Energis zennippon Another voice skeptic Board Member reference ITIL citizen Yup, you nailed it.
But see skeptic Another name is - Visitor Skep.. Are you guilty of buraddo Try this from a member of an EI Visitor Feed
Popular contentAll time:
Other things the IT Skeptic is up toIt may be egotistical to think anybody cares, but for those of you visiting this site while at work, here are some links for your idle curiousity: | |||||
ITIL concepts are in the public domain?
By the way, if Computerworld think ITIL concepts are in the public domain, how do they explain OGC quietly disappearing section 1.1.1 of the ITIL V2 books? I can't check the V3 books (I don't have them here with me in Amsterdam). Anybody help?
Public Domain
Well, in the V3 books, section 1.2.2 talks about "Good practice in the public domain". Once you read past the stuff about good practice being good, it says "publicly frameworks and standards such as ITIL, COBIT, CMMI, eSCM-SP, PRINCE2, ISO 9000, ISO/IEC 20000, AND ISO/IEC 27001 are validated acrtoss a diverse set of environments and situations....." and on and on. It goes further to say "ignoring public frameworks and standards can needlessly place an organization at a disadvantage".
So, I take it it's back in the public domain...at least for now...
Liz
Typo.....
The typo is mine..not the books. "Publicly AVAILABLE frameworks...."
A new finding in the books!
I've been reading carefully the official introduction to the service lifecycle book and I've found another little pearl in the contents:
On page 13,first paragraph of section 2.7 it says: "An important aspect of ITIL is the 'open-source' nature of its practices"
Great, isn't it? :-)
the ITIL Detective
Antonio, you are the ITIL Detective! A second great discovery, following on from the Disappearing 1.1.1. I'm rather glad they put that back in.