<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Certification via online training is back on again</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-certification-online-training-back-again</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Call of a crow!!*   What is going on in Castle ITIL?   Is there a battle royal between vendor factions?  The whole V3 Certification thing is lurching around like a pantomime donkey where the front guy has flatulence.  Start of August it is confirmed from a good source that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/716&quot;&gt;online training will not be possible&lt;/a&gt; for ITIL V3 course above Foundations level.  It is in writing to some training providers that this is the case.  End of August, e-learning is back in the syllabus.  Apart from being very hard to keep up with, this leads to a dire prediction for ATOs if Castle ITIL decides to cut out the middleman...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-certification-online-training-back-again&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-certification-online-training-back-again#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:15:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1187 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Considering ITIL? Ignore ROI that other organisations have achieved </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/considering-itil-ignore-roi-other-organisations-ha</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Research on ITIL ROI would be a useful thing for the general information of the industry, but if you are considering whether or not to adopt ITIL, any ROI information you can find now is useless.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/considering-itil-ignore-roi-other-organisations-ha&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/considering-itil-ignore-roi-other-organisations-ha#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/8">ROI</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:49:07 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1179 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Live is still coming - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1170</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the orginal post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-live-still-coming-and-very-expensive&quot;&gt;ITIL V3 Live is ... still coming, and VERY expensive&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see the long-awaited &quot;ITIL portal&quot; is showing off. It will go live on 10th November. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1170&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1170/itil_v3_live.mp3" length="2330057" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>5:31</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1170#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/35">TSO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:46:26 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1170 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL snake oil - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1169</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of &lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;the original article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once upon a time IT Service Management was a movement dedicated to improving the levels of service delivered by IT.  And ITIL was a body of knowledge put together by the government as a public service and released into the public domain.  The books weren&#039;t free simply because costs had to be covered.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now it is turning into just another snake oil peddled by shiny suits.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1169/itil_snake_oil.mp3" length="3337600" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>7:55</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1169#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/35">TSO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:35:10 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1169 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL snake oil</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-snake-oil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1169&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once upon a time IT Service Management was a movement dedicated to improving the levels of service delivered by IT.  And ITIL was a body of knowledge put together by the government as a public service and released into the public domain.  The books weren&#039;t free simply because costs had to be covered.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now it is turning into just another snake oil peddled by shiny suits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-snake-oil&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-snake-oil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/35">TSO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:15:32 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1167 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Project Mgmt in ITIL V3 - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the original article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/611&quot;&gt;Why is Project Management almost invisible in ITIL V3?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PM is the engine that moves much stuff (hopefully just about everything) from Development to Production, which is pretty important now that ITIL has muscled into Application Management.  PM should interlock with Change Management and Testing.  PM should provide most of the Early Life Support.  Release and Deployment shouldn&#039;t move without PM: if it is big enough to be a release it should be a project.  And so on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1165/project_management_in_itil_3.mp3" length="4551954" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>10:48</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:37:42 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1165 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Live is ... still coming, and VERY expensive</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-live-still-coming-and-very-expensive</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1170&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/515&quot;&gt;long-awaited&lt;/a&gt; &quot;ITIL portal&quot; is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tso.co.uk/itil/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;showing off&lt;/a&gt;.  It will go live on 10th November. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if you were wondering what ever happened to the promised process maps for ITIL, or where you could get work instructions and role descriptions for the ITIL processes, or where to get ITIL V3 in Visio or Word templates, wonder no more.   It is all here.   All you have to do is pay more money.  LOTS of money.  To TSO.  Two and a half thousand fadurkin&#039; British Pounds Sterling per annum to be precise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-live-still-coming-and-very-expensive&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-live-still-coming-and-very-expensive#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/35">TSO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:21:49 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1163 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google Trends is always interesting</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-trends-always-interesting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I got whipped in the stock market bubble like many people, so I&#039;m the last to read too much into graphs any more, but nevertheless I always find &lt;a href=&quot;http://trends.google.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Google Trends&lt;/a&gt; interesting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/google-trends-always-interesting&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-trends-always-interesting#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:13:08 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1131 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What do all the sites without a CMDB do? - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1162</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the orginal post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1123&quot;&gt;What do all the sites without a CMDB do?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are some fundamental fallacies behind the arguments for CMDB and a recent article encapsulated a number of them. Why do we keep getting told a CMDB is essential when almost nobody has one?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1162/sites_without_a_cmdb.mp3" length="4400182" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>10:27</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1162#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 04:02:25 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1162 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL experts are elsewhere - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1161</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the origninal post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1119&quot;&gt;Give up on ITIL V3 training and certification - it is not going to change&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Yet another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/702#comment-3478&quot;&gt;unhappy camper&lt;/a&gt; prompted me to hammer on the cold stone walls of Castle ITIL once again, right over the blood-stains of last time I tried.  But I won&#039;t.  I give up.   ITIL training and certification isn&#039;t going to change.  It has been taken over by the money engine and is lost.  The real experts are elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1161/itil_experts_are_elsewhere.mp3" length="2253622" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>5:20</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1161#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 03:32:49 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1161 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
