<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL doesn&#039;t add overhead</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-doesnt-add-overhead</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m intrigued by the endless repetition of the chant &quot;ITIL slows things down&quot;.  No it doesn&#039;t.  Doing things properly slows things down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-doesnt-add-overhead&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-doesnt-add-overhead#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2116</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/236">cowboys</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:12:38 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2116 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The difference between ITIL and COBIT for consultants: four words</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/difference-between-itil-and-cobit-consultants-four</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As a consultant, COBIT is my first-choice body of knowledge for my engagements.   I go to it first* to assess, to frame, to define, to justify, to audit.  I turn to ITIL second, when I need more detail, or when I need the authority of the holy of holies to justify what I suggest.  There are two reasons for this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/difference-between-itil-and-cobit-consultants-four&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/difference-between-itil-and-cobit-consultants-four#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2106</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/204">consulting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:46:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2106 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The state of ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/state-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Some time ago I did some research for APMG on the state of ITIL.  Now the resulting white paper &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.best-management-practice.com/gempdf/Review_ITIL_Studies_White_Paper_Nov11.pdf&quot; target=&quot;-blank&quot;&gt;has been published&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/state-itil&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/state-itil#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2098</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:37:15 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2098 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL training fun and games at itSMFUK conference - and an end to competition?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-training-fun-and-games-itsmfuk-conference-and</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic hears on the grapevine that the ITIL training industry may be having a few meetings of its own at the itSMF UK conference next week.  And the topics of conversation may bear on the continued competition between Examination Institutes (EIs).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-training-fun-and-games-itsmfuk-conference-and&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-training-fun-and-games-itsmfuk-conference-and#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2085</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/31">training</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:10:40 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2085 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lean IT and ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/lean-it-adn-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One sees a few remarks in the webisphere that suggest folk don&#039;t get the relationship between Lean IT and ITIL &lt;small&gt;(thanks to my friend Bob Grinsell, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realitsm.com/EgoITSM&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;RIPOFF #1&lt;/a&gt;, for reminding me of this issue by his comment on the itSMF USA forum)&lt;/small&gt;.  Lean is a method.  ITIL is a framework.  These are different things for different purposes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/lean-it-adn-itil&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/lean-it-adn-itil#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2083</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:11:40 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2083 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Riddle me this: matching ITIL theory to the real world</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/riddle-me-matching-itil-theory-real-world</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Calling all you ITIL theorists, philosophers, pontificators and pundits.  Marty is back: our follower from the real world, trying to make sense of ITIL on its home grounds, the operations of big iron batch computing.  Marty asks what happens after a service is restored? What does ITIL call the function of undoing the damage done while a service was unavailable?  I have a view - of course - but I&#039;m going to stay quiet - for a while- and hear what everyone else thinks.  So have at it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/riddle-me-matching-itil-theory-real-world&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/riddle-me-matching-itil-theory-real-world#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2081</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/184">incident</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/157">problem</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:53:12 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2081 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Does ITIL explain the difference between an Alert and an Event?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/does-itil-explain-difference-between-alert-and-eve</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Help me please.  I&#039;m thrashing around in the morass of &lt;i&gt;Service Operation&lt;/i&gt;, trying to get crystal clear on the difference/relationship between an Alert and an Event.  Anyone?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S. we did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/event-management-best-practices&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;skirt around this discussion before&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/does-itil-explain-difference-between-alert-and-eve#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2073</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/279">alert</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/266">event</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:26:55 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2073 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL 2011 persists with the dangerous concept of supporting services</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not only has ITIL V3.1 2011 not fixed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-services-are-customer-facing-whatever-catalog&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the problems with business-vs-technical services&lt;/a&gt;, they have gone the wrong way and reinforced the problem.  I will fight to the death to say there is no such thing as internal supporting &quot;services&quot;, because I care about ITSM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2070</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:43:55 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2070 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DevOps and ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/devops-and-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/devops-and-traditional-itsm-why-devops-wont-change&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;I had a few things to say about DevOps&lt;/a&gt;.  In a nutshell, DevOps is a niche approach to service design and delivery, which won&#039;t have much impact in the near future on traditional Operations of core systems.  The concept of better integration between Dev and Ops is good, but the cultural issues and most of all the risks speak against it.  And the way some people interpret it is downright dangerous.  Now I want to zoom in to look at the relationship between DevOps and ITIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/devops-and-itil&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/devops-and-itil#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2065</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/258">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:17:18 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2065 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My how ITIL has grown: the size of the new ITIL V3 2011</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We have more news on ITIL &lt;strike&gt;V3.1&lt;/strike&gt; V3 &quot;2011 Edition&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmfi.org/content/itil-2011-book-details-tso&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;from itSMF International&lt;/a&gt;.  Of most note is the extraordinary increase in the size of ITIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2049</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 04:18:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2049 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

