<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>best practice</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Lean IT and ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/lean-it-adn-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One sees a few remarks in the webisphere that suggest folk don&#039;t get the relationship between Lean IT and ITIL &lt;small&gt;(thanks to my friend Bob Grinsell, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realitsm.com/EgoITSM&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;RIPOFF #1&lt;/a&gt;, for reminding me of this issue by his comment on the itSMF USA forum)&lt;/small&gt;.  Lean is a method.  ITIL is a framework.  These are different things for different purposes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/lean-it-adn-itil&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/lean-it-adn-itil#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2083</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:11:40 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2083 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Good practice and best practice</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/good-practice-and-best-practice</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ITIL V3 did a little word dance around what &quot;good practice&quot; and &quot;best practice&quot; mean which had more to do with political semantics and digging themselves out of a hole than it did about what the terms really mean.  It ought to be straightforward:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/good-practice-and-best-practice&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/good-practice-and-best-practice#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1917</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/177">terminology</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:50:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1917 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Create a variance register for ITIL and other frameworks</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/create-variance-register-itil-and-other-frameworks</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps I missed it but I&#039;ve never seen this idea described before: all sites should have a register of variances from best/generally-accepted/good practice frameworks such as ITIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/create-variance-register-itil-and-other-frameworks&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/create-variance-register-itil-and-other-frameworks#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1595</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:16:25 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1595 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When Best is Too Good - Copper Instead of Gold - focused excellence as a differentiator</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/when-best-too-good-copper-instead-gold-focused-exc</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A leading cultural assumption in the business world is that anything we do should be benchmarked against world’s best practice.  But why pay for gold when copper will do?  Don’t aim for best when there is no business driver to do so.  Organisations are wasting resource and damaging themselves unnecessarily chasing a “best” standard for everything.  A concept that deserves more attention is “core practice”: the minimum needed to get the job done within acceptable risk.  Save “best” for focused areas where it counts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/when-best-too-good-copper-instead-gold-focused-exc&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/when-best-too-good-copper-instead-gold-focused-exc#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1502</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:27:04 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1502 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 has a bet each way: proven guidance and bleeding edge thought-leadership, but how to tell?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/607</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Every so often discussion on this blog touches on something fundamental.  Lately we&#039;ve been examining how ITIL seems to have a bet each way: it wants to be proven and bleeding edge at the same time.  This is dangerous for the very people ITIL is supposed to serve.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/607&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/607#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/607</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:12:44 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">607 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Five reasons ITIL Version 3 is not &quot;Best Practice&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/419</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Over a year ago, the IT Skeptic argued that ITIL is not best practice.  Now Version 3 is upon us, has anything changed?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/419&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/419#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/419</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:32:14 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">419 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IT ops can learn from Lean - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/347</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Keep an eye on Lean. It is the next big thing (fad or real change?). I always watch what is coming across from manufacturing to IT because - in the service management area at least - that is the trend: manufacturing teaches us.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/347/lean.mp3" length="3577377" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>3:43</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/347#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/347</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 03:20:33 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">347 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IT operations can learn from lean manufacturing</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/343</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This article has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/347&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keep an eye on Lean.  It is the next big thing (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/8&quot;&gt;fad&lt;/a&gt; or real change?).  I always watch what is coming across from manufacturing to IT because - in the service management area at least - that is the trend: manufacturing teaches us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/343&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/343#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/343</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:05:48 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">343 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is ITIL Best Practice?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/16</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;“Best” is a brave word.  “Best” leads with the chin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following is reprinted with permission. [Update: This post dates from when the IT Skeptic was anonymous.  The IT Skeptic asked Rob England for permission to reprint the article and Rob kindly agreed.  Since they are both me, the conversation was held in my head.]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/16&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/16#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/16</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:13:51 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">16 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why chase Best Practice?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/15</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I worked with a number of clients in a previous vendor life who were struggling to “do ITIL” because they felt (or had been told) they had to.  There was little or no funding, often no project.  And why?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/15&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/15#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/15</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 05:11:43 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

