http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/102 The taxonomy view with a depth of 0. en http://www.itskeptic.org/there-no-such-thing-itil-non-compliant-software-to <p>Many people argue that there is no such thing as ITIL compliance because there is no exact standard to audit against. Perhaps it is all semantics but I don't take such an absolute position - it seems to me that it ought to be measurable or at least assessable in some way. On the other hand I think the opposite statement is clearly true: There is no such thing as ITIL NON-compliant software tools.</p> <p><a href="http://www.itskeptic.org/there-no-such-thing-itil-non-compliant-software-to">read more</a></p> http://www.itskeptic.org/there-no-such-thing-itil-non-compliant-software-to#comments compliance ITIL Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:35:18 -0600 skeptic 1193 at http://www.itskeptic.org http://www.itskeptic.org/node/263 <p>[updated: it seems salient to revisit this post. To the vendor who proudly declared on this blog that your product is "ITIL aligned" you might like to measure that "alignment" against this list. ("Aligned" is the new slippery-speak now that "compliant" is on the nose)]</p> <h2>The IT Skeptic’s ITIL <strike>Compliance</strike> <em>Alignment</em> Criteria</h2> <p><a href="http://www.itskeptic.org/node/263">read more</a></p> http://www.itskeptic.org/node/263#comments compliance ITIL Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:08:22 -0600 skeptic 263 at http://www.itskeptic.org