<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>process</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Building complex people systems</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1079</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When we speak of a new profession(alism), could it be that by focusing on IT we are focusing on the wrong thing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1079&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1079#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/56">professionalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:53:22 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1079 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>OGC publish a useless Lifecycle Process Model for ITIL V3</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/583</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-left&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.best-management-practice.com/ITILV3ProcessModel&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/ITIL_V3_process_model.thumbnail.gif&quot; alt=&quot;ITIL V3 process model&quot; title=&quot;ITIL V3 process model&quot;  class=&quot;image image-thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;95&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;OGC have recently published the long-promised Lifecycle Process Model for ITIL V3.  It is pretty much useless in its published state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/583&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/583#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:48:30 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">583 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Processes</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-processes</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Last updated 9th May 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All ten processes and one function from ITIL version 2 are there in ITIL version 3. So too are a number of new process and functions: at least 13 by my count, 17 by others.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-processes&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-processes#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:14:35 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">534 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Technology does not fix process problems, but that&#039;s still what people want to see</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/288</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,1540,2152592,00.asp?kc=BLBLBEMNL070307EOAD&quot;&gt;lovely example&lt;/a&gt; of the &quot;Someone screwed up.  What are you going to buy to fix it?&quot; mentality that plagues this industry:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/288&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/288#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:52:10 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">288 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
