<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>process</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL v3 Process Maps</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh Great ITIL Wizard,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think of these &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.it-processmaps.com/products/itil-process-map.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ITIL process maps&lt;/a&gt;.   Are they worth it?  It looks to me just something else to update, however, if put to actual and continual use, they could be a tremendous benefit.  Especially for a company that is just starting to implement ITIL best practices...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much appreciated,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cmajewsk&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1995</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:01:53 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cmajewsk</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1995 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CMM is back to front</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cmm-back-front</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think that CMM is back to front.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/cmm-back-front&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/cmm-back-front#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1955</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248">CMM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:04:28 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1955 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What ITIL V3 means by Process</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-itil-v3-means-process</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Since the release of ITIL version 3 (v3) there is much “Ding! Dong! The Process is dead!” but I don’t think so. There is a burgeoning market for third-party process charts for v3. Authors are interpreting the new “v3-speak” back into the process-centric frame of reference where most users are still comfortable. We just got over the wrench away from techno-centric towards process-centric with ITIL Version 2 (v2). Many people aren’t ready for service-centric yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/what-itil-v3-means-process&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-itil-v3-means-process#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1341</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:31:56 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1341 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Great insights into process</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/great-insights-process</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today I&#039;d like to share with you a quote from someone I consider the greatest business thinker since Drucker, greater even than the authors of &lt;em&gt;Service Strategy&lt;/em&gt;.  I am of course referring to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dilbert.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Scott Adams&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/great-insights-process&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/great-insights-process#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1290</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:34:15 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1290 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Deming cycle diagram the wrong way round</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/deming-cycle-diagram-wrong-way-round</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/Deming.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image image-preview&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;178&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Here is an amusing thing: all those diagrams of the Deming Cycle turn the wrong way. &lt;span style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/deming-cycle-diagram-wrong-way-round&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/deming-cycle-diagram-wrong-way-round#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1210</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 01:26:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1210 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>repeatable process</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1070</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Past discussions on this blog have suggested that a process fixation such as ITIL&#039;s engenders an inflexibility and ponderousness in an organisation.  Whilst I am a process fan, there is an important point to be addressed here about how ITIL relates to nimbleness and adaptability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1070&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1070#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1070</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:46:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1070 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The IT Skeptic&#039;s Unofficial List of ITIL Version 3 Processes</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/690</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ITIL V3 shies away from the whole concept of processes.  They are avoided and obfuscated, sometimes called elements, jumbled up with functions.  And most of all, the &quot;complete&quot; lists &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/416&quot;&gt;are all different&lt;/a&gt;!   in an effort to get a grasp on this, here is the IT Skeptic&#039;s cross reference of them all and hence the resulting IT Skeptic&#039;s Unofficial List of ITIL Version 3 Processes  (ta daaah!)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/690&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/690#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/690</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:20:26 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">690 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Building complex people systems</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1079</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When we speak of a new profession(alism), could it be that by focusing on IT we are focusing on the wrong thing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1079&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1079#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1079</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/56">professionalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:53:22 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1079 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>OGC publish a useless Lifecycle Process Model for ITIL V3</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/583</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-left&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.best-management-practice.com/ITILV3ProcessModel&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/ITIL_V3_process_model.thumbnail.gif&quot; alt=&quot;ITIL V3 process model&quot; title=&quot;ITIL V3 process model&quot;  class=&quot;image image-thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;95&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;OGC have recently published the long-promised Lifecycle Process Model for ITIL V3.  It is pretty much useless in its published state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/583&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/583#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/583</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:48:30 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">583 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Processes</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-processes</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Last updated 9th February 2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All ten processes and one function from ITIL version 2 are there in ITIL version 3. So too are a number of new process and functions: at least 13 by my count, 17 by others.  My &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/690&quot;&gt;unofficial &quot;definitive list&quot; is here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-processes&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-processes#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/534</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:14:35 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">534 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

