<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>catalogue</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Service Catalogue in a nutshell</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/service-catalogue-nutshell</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A reader asked for advice on Service Catalogue.  Here&#039;s my &quot;Service Catalogue in a nutshell&quot;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/service-catalogue-nutshell&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/service-catalogue-nutshell#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2079</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:03:11 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2079 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL 2011 persists with the dangerous concept of supporting services</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not only has ITIL V3.1 2011 not fixed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-services-are-customer-facing-whatever-catalog&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the problems with business-vs-technical services&lt;/a&gt;, they have gone the wrong way and reinforced the problem.  I will fight to the death to say there is no such thing as internal supporting &quot;services&quot;, because I care about ITSM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2070</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:43:55 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2070 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>sample Business Service Catalogues are generally hideous</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/sample-business-service-catalogues-are-generally-h</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why are so many sample Business Service Catalogues so hideously boring? - dull and analytical.   They should be written by marketing people: they should be brochures.  Bright and  colourful, creating a positive impression, selling the benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/sample-business-service-catalogues-are-generally-h#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1572</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:18:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1572 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Catalogue yourselves as an Information Service Provider</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/catalogue-yourselves-information-service-provider</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If your service catalogue says you provide application &quot;hosting&quot;, your IT department is committing organisational suicide.  You need to be an Information Service Provider.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/catalogue-yourselves-information-service-provider&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/catalogue-yourselves-information-service-provider#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1973</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:52:55 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1973 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The heart of ITIL is the service catalogue</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/heart-itil-service-catalogue</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh dear.  “&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securecomputer.org/2010/08/08/a-cmdb-of-risk/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The heart of ITIL is the CMDB&lt;/a&gt;”? No it isn’t. Not unless you are looking at ITIL from underneath.  Yet another example of inside-out thinking instead of outside-in.  Do customers care about the CMDB more than the Catalogue?  No.  Is ITSM about being customer-focused and service-centric?  Well, I thought so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The heart of ITIL is the service catalogue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/heart-itil-service-catalogue&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/heart-itil-service-catalogue#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1909</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:44:08 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1909 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>There is only one service catalogue</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/there-only-one-service-catalogue</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Technical vs Business service catalogue: we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-services-are-customer-facing-whatever-catalog&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;had a go at this argument previously&lt;/a&gt; but I am discussing it again over on LinkedIn and I have - I hope - a clearer way of stating the position.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmwatch.com/itil/article.php/3877016/Demystifying-The-Confusing-Service-Catalog.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;popular perception of a Technical Service Catalogue&lt;/a&gt; is that it described different service entities than a Business Service Catalogue.   That&#039;s just plain wrong.  It gives IT staff entirely the wrong attitudes and mindset.  So here is my shot at a definitive statement of position on Technical vs Business Service Catalogue.  For any organisational unit, for the services that are the outputs across the boundary of that unit, &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;there is only one service catalogue&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; ...and only one set of services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/there-only-one-service-catalogue&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/there-only-one-service-catalogue#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1913</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 04:04:32 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1913 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The service catalogue according to the IT Skeptic</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/service-catalogue-according-it-skeptic</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://numarasoftware.webex.com/numarasoftware/onstage/g.php?t=a&amp;amp;d=751745790&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/IT_skeptic_service.png&quot; alt=&quot;Image&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; style=&quot;float: right&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Those of you who have the misfortune to NOT live in this part of the planet probably won&#039;t be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/see-you-melbourne&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;at the Aussie itSMF conference&lt;/a&gt; to meet me, so how about coming to debate service catalogues with me&lt;a href=&quot;https://numarasoftware.webex.com/numarasoftware/onstage/g.php?t=a&amp;amp;d=751745790&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; on next week&#039;s webinar&lt;/a&gt; where I&#039;ll be giving my own unconventional views on the topic.  We&#039;ll be taking live questions!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/service-catalogue-according-it-skeptic&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/service-catalogue-according-it-skeptic#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1883</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:43:59 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1883 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ensuring the service catalogue gets used</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/ensuring-service-catalogue-gets-used</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The question was asked on a LinkedIn forum: after the initial launch and training for a service catalogue, how to ensure it gets used?  My view:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/ensuring-service-catalogue-gets-used&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/ensuring-service-catalogue-gets-used#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1872</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:47:34 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1872 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL services are customer-facing,  whatever catalogue they appear in</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-services-are-customer-facing-whatever-catalog</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh dear it&#039;s an outbreak.  I&#039;m once again debating on a forum whether the services in the Technical Service Catalogue are different services from those in the Business Service Catalogue.  And it shows up recently on a major website.  I consider this concept of internal IT services as nothing short of tragic.   Anyone who thinks the two catalogues could list different services clearly fails to grasp the whole fundamental point of service management, which is to get everyone to think in terms of the service delivered to the customer.  And there are plenty of folk think that way, judging by early results &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/services-catalogued-not-just-mentioned-itil-tech-s&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;in our latest poll&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-services-are-customer-facing-whatever-catalog&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-services-are-customer-facing-whatever-catalog#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1855</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 16:55:16 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1855 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shock horror: the IT Skeptic endorses a technology - service catalogue</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/shock-horror-it-skeptic-endorses-technology-servic</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;[Updated with a Health Warning]  Recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-business-service-catalogue-and-technical-s&quot;&gt;I wrote&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;It seems Technical Service Catalogue is often misunderstood to mean a catalogue of different services from those in the Business Service Catalogue. It&#039;s not. It is a different view of the same services&quot;&lt;/em&gt;. And those views are quite complex.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/shock-horror-it-skeptic-endorses-technology-servic&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/shock-horror-it-skeptic-endorses-technology-servic#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1807</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:54:44 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1807 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

