<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>ISO9000</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/140</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Will ISO9000 absorb or displace ITIL?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/595</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Many people, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.certification.info/2008/04/iso-20000-set-to-take-over-itil.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ITSMView&lt;/a&gt;, are asking the question &quot;Is ISO 20000 set to take over ITIL?&quot;  Perhaps they should be looking over their shoulder at another ISO standard and the associated industry: ISO9000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/595&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/595#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/27">ISO20000</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/140">ISO9000</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/141">MOF</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:41:31 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">595 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
