<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>SKMS</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/142</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What is the difference between CMS and SKMS?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-difference-between-cms-and-skms</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dear The&lt;br /&gt;
I am prepping to take ITIL v3 Intermediate- Rel, Control &amp;amp; Validation and am confused on the difference between CMS and SKMS. The Service Transition book gives me the impression that the CMS is only the data &amp;amp; information layer of the SKMS and therefore the knowledge processing layer and presentation layer are not in the scope of the CMS. Is this correct?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Beats Me&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/what-difference-between-cms-and-skms&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-difference-between-cms-and-skms#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1800</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/142">SKMS</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 19:08:48 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>TheITILWizard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1800 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Warning don&#039;t try ITIL V3&#039;s SKMS at work</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/614</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ITIL V3&#039;s Service Knowledge Management System (SKMS) is something to aspire to.  But it is seldom a good decision to do it right now. WARNING: don&#039;t try this at work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/614&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/614#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/614</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/142">SKMS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:38:38 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">614 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>While ITIL V2 CMDB was silly, ITIL V3 SKMS is totally absurd</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/604</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At the request of a fellow skeptic, I am asking readers to name one, just one, example of an ITIL V3 Service Knowledge Management System, SKMS, in the wild.  Not the beginnings of one or part of one, or a bastardised version of one.  Just one fully formed, grown up, functioning SKMS.   Name one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/604&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/604#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/604</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/142">SKMS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:44:29 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">604 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

