<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Application</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/143</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Controlling Application Development</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/618</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/635&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How does IT Operations get control of &quot;the other half&quot;?  How do we stop them chucking dead cats over the wall for us to own?  It is pretty straightforward.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/618&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/618#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/143">Application</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:34:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">618 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Application Management is a skinny little weakling</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/617</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-left&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/node/616&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/astro.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image image-preview&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;155&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;ITIL attempts to establish authority over Application Management.   Does ITIL V3 have what it takes?  No.  As bodies of knowledge go, it is scrawny and under-developed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/617&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/617#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/143">Application</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:54:59 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">617 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL and ASL: divorced bodies of knowledge.   How ITIL V3 failed to ask the experts.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/582</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone who is interested in ITIL V3&#039;s credibility in the Application Management space should read the recent OGC white paper which shows how little ITIL used an existing respected on-hand body of knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/582&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/582#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/143">Application</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/139">ASL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 03:23:04 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">582 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
