<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>analysts</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Those who would promote CMDB should promote CMDB</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/those-who-would-promote-cmdb-should-promote-cmdb</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Much of what we read about CMDB is actually singing the praises of asset management, network discovery or other simpler technologies.  Other benefits attributed to CMDB actually come from process improvement and do not depend on the technology at all.  When all you want to sell is a hammer...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/those-who-would-promote-cmdb-should-promote-cmdb&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/those-who-would-promote-cmdb-should-promote-cmdb#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:14:50 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1173 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EMA CMDB research: where&#039;s the wave?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/732</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Recent &quot;research&quot; (in the analyst sense of the word) from EMA shows that even amongst those who say they are working on a CMDB [which &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/663&quot;&gt;other numbers&lt;/a&gt; indicate is 10%-30% of the ITIL population], those with functional CMDBs remain a minority.  This confirms our recent assertion that CMS and SKMS and CMDB represent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/607&quot;&gt;best practice blue sky&lt;/a&gt;.  There is nothing &quot;generally accepted&quot; about CMDB practice: about 2%-5% of IT shops I reckon.  In true market-hyping fashion Dennis Drogseth of EMA is fond of referring to the &quot;CMDB tidal wave&quot;.  Based on their own numbers I gotta ask: where&#039;s the wave Dennis?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/732&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/732#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:57:40 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">732 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>BMC&#039;s own CMDB figures - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the original post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713&quot;&gt;a back-of-an-envelope re-analysis of Forrester and BMC&#039;s own CMDB research&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several readers argue well that ROI is not the right measure for a CMDB, but nevertheless management want to know what they get for their money, and BMC&#039;s own research suggests &quot;not much&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1075/bmc_cmdb_figures.mp3" length="4017462" type="audio/x-mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>9:32</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:17:15 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1075 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>a back-of-an-envelope re-analysis of Forrester and BMC&#039;s own CMDB research</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several readers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/712#comment-3241&quot;&gt;argue well&lt;/a&gt; that ROI is not the right measure for a CMDB, but nevertheless management want to know what they get for their money, and BMC&#039;s own research suggests &quot;not much&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:23:24 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">713 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Crap Factoid Alert: CMDB savings of more than $1 million per year </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-left&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/528&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/chokey_extreme.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image image-preview&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;152&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/722&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;background-color:red;&quot;&gt;This is a CATEGORY 1 Crap Factoid alert from Chokey the Chimp at the IT Skeptic&#039;s Crap Factoid Warning Service.  &lt;strong&gt;THIS IS NOT A DRILL&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;  Be on EXTREME danger alert for CF &quot;CMDB savings of more than $1 million per year&quot;.  BMC and Forrester are shovelling it. [Update: more on this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:31:38 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">709 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IT analysts produce crap factoids - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/569</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a podcast of the original article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/544&quot;&gt;IT analysts produce crap - what to look for in analyst &quot;research&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/569&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/569/IT_analysts_produce_crap.mp3" length="5916617" type="audio/x-mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>14:03</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/569#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:05:48 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">569 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Analyst crap factoids as memes: nobody thinks any more</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/567</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There are a couple of fundamental causes underlying the success of analyst crap factoids as memes [a meme is an idea that propogates through the species like a gene].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/567&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/567#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:41:43 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">567 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IT analysts produce crap  - what to look for in analyst &quot;research&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/544</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/569&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-right&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/chokey_extreme.thumbnail.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image image-thumbnail&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;76&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Crap Factoids are pure B.S. that almost sound like a fact, and will be presented so often that everyone will think it true.  Let us look closer at a classic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130&quot;&gt;Crap Factoid&lt;/a&gt; where the results were deliberately skewed, then hyped up by marketing people, and the resulting Crap Factoid thrown to the winds like GM seed.  It is time people called analysts to task for this stuff because we all suffer the consequences when decision makers fall for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/544&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/544#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:43:51 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">544 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Crap Factoid Alert: &quot;Two-thirds of companies around the globe are using ITIL&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/481</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic&#039;s Crap Factoid Early Warning Service has  detected another Crap Factoid (pure B.S. that will be presented so often that everyone will think it true) emerging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/481&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/481#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:55:28 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">481 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IT Skeptic Awards 2007 - IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/437</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/430&quot;&gt;the original article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic is pleased to announce our annual New Year&#039;s awards, inaugurated last year. These awards are presented to deserving figures and organisations in the IT industry in general and the ITSM industry in particular.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/437/IT_skeptic_awards_2007.mp3" length="6040960" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>14:21</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/437#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/35">TSO</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:16:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">437 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
