<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>project</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>IT project portfolios are bursting while BAU crumbles!</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/it-project-portfolios-are-bursting-while-bau-crumb</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps it is just New Zealand, but I&#039;m seeing a pattern amongst a majority of clients where IT operations business as usual (BAU) is crumbling under the load of project work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/it-project-portfolios-are-bursting-while-bau-crumb&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/it-project-portfolios-are-bursting-while-bau-crumb#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1612</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/239">portfolio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:08:30 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1612 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why IT projects fail: underspend</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-it-projects-fail-underspend</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s my theory on why so many IT projects fail to deliver the expected result: we underspend on what matters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/why-it-projects-fail-underspend&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-it-projects-fail-underspend#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1932</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/137">business case</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:00:56 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1932 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The IT Skeptic presents on Owning ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1542</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a presentation given to the New Zealand Computer Society on 25th June 2009, on the topic of &quot;Owning ITIL&quot;.  it covers why ITIL is pretty much always a project, what to watch out for in ITIL projects (ITIL the Cult, ITIl the fad, CMDB can&#039;t be done...), what to expect from ITIL.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1542/nzcs-2009-06-25-56466.mp3" length="14731776" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>40:52</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>NZ Computer Society</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1542#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1542</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:23:47 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1542 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Owning ITIL: project horror stories</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/owning-itil-project-horror-stories</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;[Bump to top - any more good stories out there? ] The IT Skeptic&#039;s new book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1243&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Owning ITIL®&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is out now.  The first ten people who contribute an accepted ITIL project horror story get a free copy of the book.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/owning-itil-project-horror-stories&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/owning-itil-project-horror-stories#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1312</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/163">Owning ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:01:19 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1312 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Checklist post ITIL implementation review</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1417</link>
 <description>
&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc0&quot;&gt;14 questions for a post-ITIL-implementation review&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.    How has this changed the way people think, speak and act?  Describe instances/anecdotes.&lt;br /&gt;
2.    What has been the feedback from customers?   Suppliers?&lt;br /&gt;
3.    How did we measure success?  Did we measure against something other than ITIL?  Did we succeed?&lt;br /&gt;
4.    What has been re-scoped, deferred or dropped since the business case?&lt;br /&gt;
5.    Are we measuring the ROI?  When will we review again to check that we got the ROI expected in the business case?&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1417&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1417#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1417</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/163">Owning ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:35:34 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1417 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Checklist progress of an ITIL project</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1416</link>
 <description>
&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc0&quot;&gt;14 questions to check on progress of an ITIL project&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.    Have you encountered resistance?  (Resistance is good).  How have you / will you overcome that?  (Ignored resistance is bad)&lt;br /&gt;
2.    What champions have you ‘converted’ to the cause, who weren’t on board at the beginning?&lt;br /&gt;
3.    What cultural change activities have you conducted: workshopping, communications (newsletters etc), consultation, walkthroughs, training, coaching, monitoring, feedback, celebration?  NB. Emails don’t count as communication&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1416&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1416#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1416</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/163">Owning ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:43:51 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1416 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Checklist ITIL project proposal</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1415</link>
 <description>
&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc0&quot;&gt;14 questions to ask about an ITIL project proposal&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.    What is the vision?  What is the strategy to achieve that vision?&lt;br /&gt;
2.    What is the driving need or requirement?&lt;br /&gt;
3.    How will success be measured?  Relative to what benchmark measured now?   Are we measuring with something other than ITIL? (See p36)  Do the metrics measure the benefits stated in the business case?&lt;br /&gt;
4.    What process maturity level(s) is the objective? (see p36)&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1415&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1415#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1415</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/163">Owning ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:02:37 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1415 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>PRINCE2 2009 refresh spookily familiar to ITIL users</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/prince2-2009-refresh-spookily-familiar-itil-users</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;PRINCE2 gets a new version this year.  For those who went through ITIL V3 Refresh, it is deja vu all over again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/prince2-2009-refresh-spookily-familiar-itil-users&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/prince2-2009-refresh-spookily-familiar-itil-users#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1412</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:40:44 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1412 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dead cat syndrome</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/dead-cat-syndrome</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/dead cat.png&quot; alt=&quot;Image&quot; style=&quot;float: left&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; /&gt;[Hi!  IF you came looking for insight into the rebounding world economy, you are looking for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=Dead+Cat+Bounce&quot;&gt;Dead Cat Bounce&lt;/a&gt;.  This post below is about IT project management.  But thanks for dropping in!   If you are interested in IT, please take a look around]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the things ITIL3 improves is the whole development/production interface, introducing radical concepts like production readiness, acceptance, evaluation... oh and testing.   Heady stuff.  But something that was omitted from ITIL V3 was documentation of Dead Cat Syndrome.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/dead-cat-syndrome&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/dead-cat-syndrome#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1129</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/153">change</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:14:22 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1129 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Project Mgmt in ITIL V3 - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the original article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/611&quot;&gt;Why is Project Management almost invisible in ITIL V3?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PM is the engine that moves much stuff (hopefully just about everything) from Development to Production, which is pretty important now that ITIL has muscled into Application Management.  PM should interlock with Change Management and Testing.  PM should provide most of the Early Life Support.  Release and Deployment shouldn&#039;t move without PM: if it is big enough to be a release it should be a project.  And so on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1165/project_management_in_itil_3.mp3" length="4551954" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>10:48</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1165</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:37:42 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1165 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

