<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>project</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Project Mgmt in ITIL V3 - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the original article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/611&quot;&gt;Why is Project Management almost invisible in ITIL V3?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PM is the engine that moves much stuff (hopefully just about everything) from Development to Production, which is pretty important now that ITIL has muscled into Application Management.  PM should interlock with Change Management and Testing.  PM should provide most of the Early Life Support.  Release and Deployment shouldn&#039;t move without PM: if it is big enough to be a release it should be a project.  And so on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1165/project_management_in_itil_3.mp3" length="4551954" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>10:48</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:37:42 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1165 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why is Project Management almost invisible in ITIL V3?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-project-management-almost-invisible-itil-v3</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1165&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why is Project Management all but invisible in ITIL V3? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/why-project-management-almost-invisible-itil-v3&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-project-management-almost-invisible-itil-v3#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:44:42 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">611 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Solid Harmony: mentions of PRINCE2 in ITIL V3</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/solid-harmony-mentions-prince2-itil-v3</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Further to my post about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/611&quot;&gt;the invisibility of Project Management in ITIL V3&lt;/a&gt;, it is interesting to see that there is even less mention of PRINCE2 in particular, despite it being ITIL&#039;s stable-mate at OGC.  Not much walking across the corridor here!  Of course, the North Americans were in control of writing much of ITIL V3 and none of it is actually done at OGC any more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/solid-harmony-mentions-prince2-itil-v3&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/solid-harmony-mentions-prince2-itil-v3#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:18:38 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1127 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lack of Management Commitment seriously affects project delivery in our organization</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/705</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is interesting that three quarters of the scientifically invalid sample of readers who actually responded to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/666&quot;&gt;our survey on&lt;/a&gt; &quot;IT has no respect for or understanding of customers and users&quot; either agreed or partly agreed with the statement.  This could mean one of several things:
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;IT is particularly hard on IT&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Never give process geeks a &quot;maybe&quot; option&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;IT has no respect for or understanding of customers and users&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&#039;d like to think we would be making some progress on this one by now.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Let&#039;s try another (with a less satanic node number this time): &quot;Lack of Management Commitment seriously affects project delivery in our organization&quot;.  How do you feel about that statement?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/705&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/705#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/151">ABC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:28:17 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">705 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>One more for the Links page</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/695</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;An IT Skeptic has gotta love a website called &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/projectfailures/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;IT Project Failures&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; so a special thankyou to &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.planview.com/tdoerscher/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Terry Doerscher&lt;/a&gt; for pointing us to it.  It is a fascinating read.  Nice to see SAP featuring at the top today - what a surprise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/695&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/695#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/5">blog</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/150">project</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:20:53 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">695 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
