<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>small</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/165</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL for small business could be called BILL: the Business Infrastructure Library of Least practice</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1114</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I did some work a while ago on SM in SMEs (that&#039;s Service Management in Small to Medium Enterprises of course: SMISME?  SM4SME [the one I use]? SMESM?).  When seen through the distorting lens of SME priorities, frameworks like ITIL look pretty different.   Every 70s deadbeat like this writer knew that you can learn by tripping out, so it is enlightening for us to look at ITIL in REALLY small organisations.  I wrote an article about it but the website is no longer available so here is the article:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1114&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1114#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1114</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/165">small</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:57:35 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1114 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

