<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>service improvement</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Tipu Framework</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/tipu-framework</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/thumbs/tipu.png&quot; alt=&quot;Image&quot; style=&quot;float: left&quot; /&gt;Tipu is an approach to planning and executing service improvement. Find out more at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.basicsm.com/tipu&quot; title=&quot;http://www.basicsm.com/tipu&quot;&gt;http://www.basicsm.com/tipu&lt;/a&gt;.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tipu has its own Framework to allow us to organise our thinking and have something to compare other frameworks to.  All the ITSM philosophers who follow this blog will be interested in it: the Framework attempts to be more complete than ITIL or COBIT.   It is also intended to be a generalised &lt;b&gt;Service Management&lt;/b&gt; framework not an ITSM one.  There is no IT-specific content, in line with my new book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.basicsm.com/bsm-basic-service-management-book&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Basic Service Management&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  Your feedback is of course welcomed.  See what you can do with it - it is Creative Commons licensed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/tipu-framework&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/tipu-framework#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2082</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268">CSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/274">tipu</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:26:22 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2082 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Great paper on failure of complex systems</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/great-paper-failure-complex-systems</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is not often you read something that completely changes the way you look at IT.  This paper &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctlab.org/documents/How%20Complex%20Systems%20Fail.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;How Complex Systems Fail&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; rocked me.  Reading this made me completely rethink ITSM, especially Root Cause Analysis, Major Incident Reviews, and Change Management.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/great-paper-failure-complex-systems&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/great-paper-failure-complex-systems#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1541</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:12:17 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1541 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Excellent customer service: weapon or burden?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/excellent-customer-service-weapon-or-burden</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How often is excellent customer service a competitive weapon and how often is it just an unnecessary cost burden on the organisation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/excellent-customer-service-weapon-or-burden&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/excellent-customer-service-weapon-or-burden#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1399</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/170">service level</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:22:23 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1399 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Where does continual service improvement end?  An important ITIL question</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/where-does-continual-service-improvement-end-impor</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Service Management is always on about Continual Service Improvement, as if this was a holy grail and an assumed permanent state of change.  What seems inadequately discussed is where does it end?  Do we improve forever?   Surely not.   We must encounter diminishing returns until eventually we are just gilding the lily.  Is the &quot;to-be&quot; always different from the &quot;as-is&quot;?  or rather is it always sufficiently different to justify doing something about it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/where-does-continual-service-improvement-end-impor&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/where-does-continual-service-improvement-end-impor#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1214</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:56:08 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1214 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

