<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>maturity</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITSM&#039;s fixation with capability maturity</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsms-fixation-capability-maturity</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The ITSM community seems to have some fixation with assessing capability maturity, or worse still process management maturity.  These are only indirect predictors for what matters: risk and cost-benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itsms-fixation-capability-maturity&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsms-fixation-capability-maturity#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1979</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248">CMM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:07:32 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1979 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Process maturity is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for improving service.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/process-maturity-neither-necessary-nor-sufficient-</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday we looked at how &lt;a href=&quot;/node/1746&quot;&gt;CMM-type maturity is not a measure&lt;/a&gt; of how well you are delivering service.    CMM only measures sophistication of management, and actually only sophistication of empirical management.  The corollary is that maturity assessments are not a measure of whether an improvement exercise was successful, not if the objective was to improve quality of service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But wait!  there&#039;s more!  Mature management-by-numbers of process is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for improving service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/process-maturity-neither-necessary-nor-sufficient-&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/process-maturity-neither-necessary-nor-sufficient-#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1748</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248">CMM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/9">cult</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:15:14 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1748 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Practice maturity is a measure of management not performance</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/practice-maturity-measure-management-not-performan</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Explaining the basic CMM 5-level model today I was reminded of a common misunderstanding about maturity: it measures how sophisticated or smart or advanced you are at managing a practice or process; it doesn&#039;t measure how well you are doing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/practice-maturity-measure-management-not-performan&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/practice-maturity-measure-management-not-performan#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1746</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:53:49 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1746 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>OGC gives us an ITIL V3 maturity assessment standard, but they won&#039;t publish</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/ogc-gives-us-itil-v3-maturity-assessment-standard-</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A recent blog set me thinking. Since OGC have now set a standard for assessing software products against ITIL processes, that should also form the basis of ITIL maturity assessment too.  All we await is OGC publishing the standard.  I bet they don&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/ogc-gives-us-itil-v3-maturity-assessment-standard-&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/ogc-gives-us-itil-v3-maturity-assessment-standard-#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1516</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/102">compliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/198">SMCG</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:13:39 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1516 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Setting the target goal for service management initiatives </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/setting-target-goal-service-management-initiatives</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When we want to know how to, say, measure a service desk, we can find quite exact guidance everywhere.  But it seems to me the depth and specificity (specifity?  specificness?) and usefulness of advice is inversely proportional to the importance of the question.  Consider the most important question we need answered in a service management initiative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/setting-target-goal-service-management-initiatives&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/setting-target-goal-service-management-initiatives#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1234</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:05:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1234 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

