<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>request</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/182</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Response Management</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/response-management</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The more I think about it the more convinced I become that the way ITIL and COBIT and ISO20000 structure incident and request fails the basic test of being customer-focused or business-aligned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/response-management&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/response-management#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1688</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/184">incident</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/27">ISO20000</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/182">request</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:43:15 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1688 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A list of Request Classes to help out ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/list-request-classes-help-out-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-incident-definition-camels-and-committees&quot;&gt;we discussed&lt;/a&gt; how I think ITIL V3 muddies the definition of Incident, and of Incident Management.  As part of that discussion I realised that my own list of Request classes had missed one, &quot;Fault&quot;.    That list came from my book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realitsm.com/node/15&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Introduction to Real ITSM&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; which is a satirical version.  A more serious one was originally published by me in the article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmwatch.com/itil/article.php/3705936&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Evolution of the ITIL Request&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; on ITSMWatch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I thought I&#039;d update my list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/list-request-classes-help-out-itil&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/list-request-classes-help-out-itil#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1303</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/182">request</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:37:12 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1303 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Incident Definition: Camels and Committees</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-incident-definition-camels-and-committees</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ITIL defines an incident to be an impact on service or a failure of a CI that might impact service.  I think that is clumsy.  An incident is an impact on service.  Period.  A failure of a CI is something else.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-incident-definition-camels-and-committees&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-incident-definition-camels-and-committees#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1302</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/182">request</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:20:44 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1302 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

