<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>service</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>is ITSM the best perspective on everything IT?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsm-best-perspective-everything-it</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is more to IT than services.  Service Management may be the topic du jour but ITSM can&#039;t consider itself the primary gateway into governance, development, acquisition, architecture, projects or HR, to name just a few other IT functions.  It may have a perspective on them but not the main one.   Or then again, maybe it is it a sufficient model for managing all of IT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itsm-best-perspective-everything-it&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsm-best-perspective-everything-it#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1596</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 01:36:48 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1596 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why does IT have to do the business&#039;s job?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-does-it-have-do-businesss-job</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the reasons IT is sinking under the burden of our work is all the projects and new services we are dealing with.  This shouldn&#039;t be IT&#039;s job.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/why-does-it-have-do-businesss-job&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-does-it-have-do-businesss-job#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1809</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/144">business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1809 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Do we overcook services? ITIL out of line</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/do-we-overcook-services-itil-out-line</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that the technoid&#039;s obsession with over-analysing  and chasing perfection - what I call ETF: Excessive Technical Fastidiousness - is often applied to the definition of services. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/do-we-overcook-services-itil-out-line&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/do-we-overcook-services-itil-out-line#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1775</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:59:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1775 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The true scope of service management and ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/true-scope-service-management-and-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Service management is IT.  It is a way of describing how to do IT - all of it.  When it comes to the scope of service management in general and ITIL in particular, the IT Skeptic has had a change of mind.  In the past I accused ITIL V3 of having aspirations beyond its station, of trying to take on areas where it has no business going, such as strategy, applications and security.  I don&#039;t think so any more: now I just think ITIL did it half-heartedly, too anaemically to be taken seriously by areas of IT outside of IT Operations.  But Service Management definitely should go there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/true-scope-service-management-and-itil&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/true-scope-service-management-and-itil#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1692</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:45:30 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1692 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Excellent customer service: weapon or burden?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/excellent-customer-service-weapon-or-burden</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How often is excellent customer service a competitive weapon and how often is it just an unnecessary cost burden on the organisation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/excellent-customer-service-weapon-or-burden&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/excellent-customer-service-weapon-or-burden#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1399</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/170">service level</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:22:23 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1399 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Say it ain&#039;t so!! ITIL V3 Incident and Problem processes do not determine the affected service</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/say-it-aint-so-itil-v3-incident-and-problem-proces</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/so-42-incident-management-process-never-determines&quot;&gt;This BOKKE&lt;/a&gt; (body of knowledge known error) has been posted for a day or so, hundreds of views.   I was sure someone would say &quot;no you idiot, service impact analysis is right here&quot; but not one.  It seems to be true.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/say-it-aint-so-itil-v3-incident-and-problem-proces&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/say-it-aint-so-itil-v3-incident-and-problem-proces#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1592</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/184">incident</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/157">problem</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:15:17 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1592 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What is a service?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-service</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The word “service” certainly gets some exercise. ITIL v3 says “A service is a means of delivering value to customers by facilitating outcomes customers want to achieve, but without the ownership of specific costs and risks.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This impenetrable bit of consultant-babble does not help those who are trying to grasp the fundamental concept. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/what-service&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-service#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1342</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:53:11 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1342 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Awful support conversations</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/awful-support-conversations</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m thinking to collect awful support conversations.   Do people like reading these for amusement?   Should we start a collection? Please let me know - comment below.  Personally I find it astonishing just how bad support can be - it never fails to amaze me (again)...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/awful-support-conversations&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/awful-support-conversations#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1389</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/191">awful</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:20:21 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1389 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>how not to do Level 1 support</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1121</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post is longer than normal but you may find it entertaining as an example of &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt; how not to do Level 1 support.  All the politeness in the world is no substitute for actually listening, and having some understanding of the environment
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;where email-based support (as compared to actually talking to people) can go wrong&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1121&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1121#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1121</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/191">awful</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:15:36 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1121 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
