<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>knowledge</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/202</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Is ITIL KEDB so important or should we always look broader?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-kedb-so-important-or-should-we-always-look-br</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A discussion on LinkedIn prompted me to comment that KEDB is a subset of knowledge management for service desk.   I think it is important to take a broader view and provide access to more general information about solutions to incidents and resolutions to requests, not just workarounds to known errors.  I&#039;ve seen folk micro-design that one bit without considering a more generally useful system.  I never quite understood why ITIL seems fixated on KEDB, giving it a disproportionate amount of attention vis-a-vis the more general support knowledgebase.  Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-kedb-so-important-or-should-we-always-look-br#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1598</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/202">knowledge</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:34:31 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1598 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is Knowledge Management a hole in COBIT?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/knowledge-management-hole-cobit</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m always banging on about how COBIT is a superset of ITIL.  So where does ITIL Knowledge Management fit in COBIT?  I don&#039;t think of it as Configuration Management even if some of the documents are CIs: KM is a much higher discipline than that.  Is this one aspect of ITIL that COBIT doesn&#039;t address?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/knowledge-management-hole-cobit&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/knowledge-management-hole-cobit#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1547</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/202">knowledge</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:37:08 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1547 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

