<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Pink</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>See you in Vegas for the Pink Elephant conference?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/see-you-vegas-pink-elephant-conference</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic will be in attendance at the 15th Annual IT Management Conference in the Bellagio, Las Vegas, 21st-23rd February (come see me in my booth!).  It&#039;s not too late to get along to the biggest and best ITSM conference around.  Check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pinkelephant.com/ITM11/ProgramDetails/SessionDescriptions.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;depth and breadth of the content&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/see-you-vegas-pink-elephant-conference&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/see-you-vegas-pink-elephant-conference#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1987</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:31:54 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1987 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rant vs counter-rant: the ITIL V3 Certification Scheme</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/rant-vs-counter-rant-itil-v3-certification-scheme</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Pierre Bernard over at Pink Elephant had a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/index.php?/itilv3/comments/personal_rant_about_people_complaining_about_the_itil_v3_scheme1/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;personal rant&quot;&lt;/a&gt; about &quot;people «complaining» about the ITIL® V3 scheme&quot; and &quot;much negativity presently in various blogs and social media sites about the ITIL® v3 scheme&quot;.   That&#039;d be me, for one, so I feel compelled to comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/rant-vs-counter-rant-itil-v3-certification-scheme&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/rant-vs-counter-rant-itil-v3-certification-scheme#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1900</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:51:28 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1900 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>emerging trends and themes of IT Service Management</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/emerging-trends-and-themes-it-service-management</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A funny thing happened on the way to the conference...  Those interested in emerging trends and themes of ITSM should check out my posts over at the Pink Elephant Conference Blog, regarding &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/index.php?/conference/comments/the_small_matter_of_the_change_of_name_of_this_conference/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;why the conference name was changed&lt;/a&gt; from IT Service Management to IT Management, and what I think are &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/index.php?/conference/comments/the_leading_themes_of_it_management_in_2010/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the four strong emergent themes&lt;/a&gt; of IT Management for 2010/2011.  Let&#039;s get some discussion going over them...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/emerging-trends-and-themes-it-service-management&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:52:37 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1860 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why the difference in numbers between PinkVerify and OGC ITIL product certifications?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-difference-numbers-between-pinkverify-and-ogc-</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There appears to be more vendors certifying their products against more processes  on PinkVerify than the OGC scheme.   Why is that?  What can OGC learn from Pink about making it easier for vendors?  or does it show that PinkVerify is too easy?  Does it matter?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/why-difference-numbers-between-pinkverify-and-ogc-&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-difference-numbers-between-pinkverify-and-ogc-#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1840</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/147">technology</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:04:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1840 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An outage on the IT Skeptic website and why technology hates me</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/outage-it-skeptic-website-and-why-technology-hates</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I hate technology.  Really.  I work with it every day, but I feel about it the same way that sanitation workers feel about their medium (or the way I HOPE they feel about it).  I use technology when I have to, to do what I want to do.  But I hate it.  And it knows it and it hates me back.   Take for example the weekend&#039;s outage on this blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/outage-it-skeptic-website-and-why-technology-hates&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/outage-it-skeptic-website-and-why-technology-hates#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1828</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/5">blog</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/147">technology</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:29:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1828 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Exhibit Hall Optimizer</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/exhibit-hall-optimizer</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is not too late to sign up for Pink Elephant&#039;s 14th Annual ITSM Conference in Las Vegas next month.  I&#039;ll see you there.  If you come along, we&#039;ll be introducing an entirely new feature: an Exhibit Hall Optimizer.  I have created &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/index.php?/conference/comments/introduction_to_ehobok/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the EHOBOK, the Exhibit Hall Optimizer Body Of Knowledge&lt;/a&gt;, as a tool for you to extract maximum value from the vendor exhibits, usually a dead zone for some of us at a conference. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/conference&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Check it out on the Conference blog&lt;/a&gt; and discover important principles such as &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/exhibit-hall-optimizer&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/exhibit-hall-optimizer#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1802</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:22:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1802 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>5 Tips For Developing An ITSM Strategic Road Map</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/5-tips-developing-itsm-strategic-road-map</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/conference&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Over on the Pink Elephant conference blog&lt;/a&gt;, I talked to Pink Elephant’s AVP Product Strategy, Troy DuMoulin, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/troy&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;who blogs regularly&lt;/a&gt; and – I think – with lots of insight.  We don’t always agree (see my recent post) but anyone who themes his blog around the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy has got to be worth reading, and the content rewards the effort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/5-tips-developing-itsm-strategic-road-map&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/5-tips-developing-itsm-strategic-road-map#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1715</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/59">strategy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:21:13 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1715 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Taking on the CMDB Deathstar</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taking-cmdb-deathstar</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone who has read my posts on &lt;a href=&quot;/cmdb&quot;&gt;CMDB&lt;/a&gt; and those of Troy DuMoulin &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/index.php?/troy/comments/cmdb_spruce_goose_death_star_or_answer_to_world_peace/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;on that same topic&lt;/a&gt; might think we disagree and they&#039;d be right... but only partly.   There is a lot we DO agree on over CMDB.  Nevertheless I look forward to some brisk debate at the Pink conference in February in Vegas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/taking-cmdb-deathstar&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/taking-cmdb-deathstar#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1693</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:15:38 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1693 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Common sense around ITIL V3 certification paths</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/common-sense-around-itil-v3-certification-paths</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In true camels/committees fashion, the ITIL V3 certification scheme is arcanely complex, as it twists itself into knots to please everyone.  Then Pink Elephant come along and make it all seem simple.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/common-sense-around-itil-v3-certification-paths&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/common-sense-around-itil-v3-certification-paths#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1517</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:11:47 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1517 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Interesting idea for spreading the expertise - and the risk</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/interesting-idea-spreading-expertise-and-risk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In our mobile age it becomes very difficult for employers to build a base of expertise in the organisation.  It leaks.  You&#039;ve no sooner paid for someone&#039;s ITIL Manager&#039;s (now Expert&#039;s) certificate and they are moving on.  Pink Elephant has been talking about an interesting alternative approach: an expert team.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/interesting-idea-spreading-expertise-and-risk&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/interesting-idea-spreading-expertise-and-risk#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1474</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/31">training</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:53:44 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1474 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

