<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>vendors</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Service Assurance and the pursuit of the elusive service view</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/service-assurance-and-pursuit-elusive-service-view</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I learned a new (for me) buzzword recently when a journalist asked me about &quot;Service Assurance&quot;.  Sounds like a new spin on an old idea: the single view of a service.  This is yet another techno-geek wet dream.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/service-assurance-and-pursuit-elusive-service-view&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/service-assurance-and-pursuit-elusive-service-view#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2068</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/272">assurance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/280">etf</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:22:51 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2068 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Don&#039;t do it here</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/lifes-silicon-beach</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There used to be a post here being very rude about a UK training company, because I was annoyed by one mindless comment-spam from them (and a crappy post that the spam was pimping).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After an email from the company explaining that the person&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
...who submitted the comment (and the article - which was very poorly&lt;br /&gt;
written and irrelevant to your post), has only been with the organisation a&lt;br /&gt;
short time - he had been tasked with raising the profile of our new ITIL&lt;br /&gt;
site. He took it upon himself to submit this comment without running it by&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/lifes-silicon-beach&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/lifes-silicon-beach#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2007</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/22">spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:55:11 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2007 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Binder-chuckers</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/binder-chuckers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/thumbs/archaeologist_canstockphoto0430447.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Image&quot; style=&quot;padding-right:2em;float: left&quot; /&gt;The problem with too many ITSM consultants is that they are binder-chuckers.  ITSM consulting is not about inventing a process.  It is about enacting cultural change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/binder-chuckers&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/binder-chuckers#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1996</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/153">change</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/124">culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:01:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1996 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL v3 Process Maps</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh Great ITIL Wizard,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think of these &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.it-processmaps.com/products/itil-process-map.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ITIL process maps&lt;/a&gt;.   Are they worth it?  It looks to me just something else to update, however, if put to actual and continual use, they could be a tremendous benefit.  Especially for a company that is just starting to implement ITIL best practices...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much appreciated,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cmajewsk&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1995</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:01:53 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cmajewsk</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1995 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A few swallows in the Cloud are not altering the landscape</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/few-swallows-cloud-are-not-altering-landscape</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m happy for Rodrigo Flores (who has probably given up on me at this point) that he has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.servicecatalogs.com/2010/12/are-people-really-delivering-private-clouds-with-a-self-service-catalog-yes-embrace-the-special-agen.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a few strong sales leads&lt;/a&gt; over Christmas.  But I don&#039;t think that constitutes the future arriving &quot;with a bang&quot;, an &quot;altered landscape&quot; or proof that Cloud is &quot;happening&quot; in any widespread transformational sense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/few-swallows-cloud-are-not-altering-landscape&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/few-swallows-cloud-are-not-altering-landscape#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1974</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cloud">cloud</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:24:23 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1974 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>For all you vendors out there</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/all-you-vendors-out-there</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here is part two of the transcript of a recent performance by the famous and fragrant folk music performer Rambling Kid Realitsm (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/song-stevie&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;part one here&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...Now my next song is for all the software vendors in the audience.  It&#039;s called &lt;i&gt;&quot;If All I Had Was a Hammer&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/all-you-vendors-out-there&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/all-you-vendors-out-there#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1921</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/238">Rambling Kid Realitsm</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:25:34 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1921 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL out of the box</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1873</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Skep,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A friend of mine works at an organisation that is migrating from one tier-1 ITIL tool vendor to another tier-1 ITIL tool vendor.  They have been assured that they can adopt ITIL compliant processes out of the box using their toolset and are starting with Incident, Problem, Change, Service Catalogue, Request Fulfilment, Configuration and Service Level Management.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vendor also sold a project manager and a technical guy for implementation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It all seems too easy.  What could possibly go wrong?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;br /&gt;
Nervous&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1873&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1873#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1873</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:48:59 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1873 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No thanks I don&#039;t want to look at your ITSM product</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/no-thanks-i-dont-want-look-your-itsm-product</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/peddler_canstockphoto2950191.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Image&quot; style=&quot;float: left&quot; width=&quot;200&quot;/&gt;When it comes to ITSM products (whether software or consulting or content or training) I&#039;m reminded of the old postcard vendors of Cairo during WWII, or the &quot;Rolex&quot; sellers of New York, or the hash-or-houseboat sellers of Srinigar, or the tart-touts of Bangkok - they&#039;re everywhere, on every corner.  As a high-profile blogger, I get this constant stream of &quot;hey buddy/mister/falang, wanna buy an ITSM?&quot;.  In the past when ITSM vendors asked I&#039;ve politely looked (or found excuses) because I know how your product is like your baby: you are immensely proud and nobody dares tell you it is ugly.  Actually most products are like most babies: they aren&#039;t ugly, they just look like every other one (my dad reckoned all babies look like Winston Churchill).   But from now on I&#039;m going to adopt a simpler answer: when I need something, I may look at your offering.  Right now I don&#039;t, so I won&#039;t, thanks anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/no-thanks-i-dont-want-look-your-itsm-product&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/no-thanks-i-dont-want-look-your-itsm-product#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1834</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:43:22 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1834 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What is the best ITIL V3 or ITSM tool?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-best-itil-v3-or-itsm-tool</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We go round this question every week on LinkedIn.   My answer is getting pretty well honed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/what-best-itil-v3-or-itsm-tool&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-best-itil-v3-or-itsm-tool#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1818</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/19">software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:53:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1818 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Exhibit Hall Optimizer</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/exhibit-hall-optimizer</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is not too late to sign up for Pink Elephant&#039;s 14th Annual ITSM Conference in Las Vegas next month.  I&#039;ll see you there.  If you come along, we&#039;ll be introducing an entirely new feature: an Exhibit Hall Optimizer.  I have created &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/index.php?/conference/comments/introduction_to_ehobok/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the EHOBOK, the Exhibit Hall Optimizer Body Of Knowledge&lt;/a&gt;, as a tool for you to extract maximum value from the vendor exhibits, usually a dead zone for some of us at a conference. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/conference&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Check it out on the Conference blog&lt;/a&gt; and discover important principles such as &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/exhibit-hall-optimizer&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/exhibit-hall-optimizer#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1802</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:22:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1802 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

