<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>In the blog</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/40</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL Version 3 London launch event announced: the IT Skeptic comments</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/161</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Man, news gets old fast.  I&#039;ve just finished &lt;a href=&quot;node/153&quot;&gt;giving itSMF heat for lack of an announcement&lt;/a&gt; and then today we get this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmf.org/node/295&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;itSMF Version 3 will be launched June 5 in London&lt;/a&gt;.  The interesting aspects of the announcement are....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/161&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/161#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/161</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/40">In the blog</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/30">Refresh</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:02:47 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">161 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rediscovering the Big Iron</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/151</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Virtualisation, CMDB, autodiscovery, swappable CPUs, intelligent media devices, systems and availability management, capacity modelling...  The mainframe worked all this out decades ago.  Here&#039;s a story I heard from fairly close to the source so it is probably fairly close to the truth.  Whatever, it makes a good story&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/151&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/151#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/151</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/40">In the blog</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/46">mainframe</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:39:09 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">151 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IBM wrote ITIL.  In fact Alasdair Meldrum did</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/145</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Just when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/143&quot;&gt;I say that all the hype is in CMDB&lt;/a&gt; and that ITIL in general is ticking along fairly soberly, along comes someone to prove me wrong.  Two people actually: someone hyping their own significance; and what passes for a journalist on the web these days uncritically lapping it up. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/145&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/145#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/145</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/7">IBM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/40">In the blog</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/4">VOIP</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:18:45 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">145 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

