<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>Web 2.0</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Civilised behaviour in decline on the internet</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/civilised-behaviour-decline-internet</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that anonymity and the emotional detachment of typed communication lead to a decline in basic civilised behaviour.  The dark side of the web is evident, such as two recent examples I have come across.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/civilised-behaviour-decline-internet&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/civilised-behaviour-decline-internet#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1760</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/172">twitter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:01:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1760 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The average blog has 100 readers</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/average-blog-has-100-readers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Back &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/not-review-cult-of-the-amateur&quot;&gt;in February I said&lt;/a&gt; (in response to that truly stupid book &lt;em&gt;Cult of the Amateur&lt;/em&gt;) &quot;the average blog will have about four readers&quot;.  It is coming true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/average-blog-has-100-readers&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/average-blog-has-100-readers#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1684</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/5">blog</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:06:46 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1684 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The internet brings middle class capitalist socialism</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/internet-brings-middle-class-capitalist-socialism</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Wired magazine seems to think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/culture/culturereviews/magazine/17-06/nep_newsocialism&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the internet heralds a new socialism&lt;/a&gt;.   This silliness stems from the same hypocricy and self-delusion that has middle class kids sitting in a house someone else built wearing clothes someone else cast off and lusting after DVDs and cell phones, while pretending to plot the downfall of Western capitalism.  The internet is perhaps the greatest creation of capitalism. It is only through the surpluses generated by its money engine and the freedom generated by its armies that twaddle such as this even gets written and read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/internet-brings-middle-class-capitalist-socialism&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/internet-brings-middle-class-capitalist-socialism#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1519</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/3">internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:54:40 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1519 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not Review Cult of the Amateur - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1334</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1291&quot;&gt;the original post&lt;/a&gt;.  [Updated: fixed the sound quality].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1334&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1334/review_cult_amateur.mp3" length="3084708" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>7:19</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1334#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1334</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:45:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1334 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nicholas Carr and the demise of journalism</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/nicholas-carr-and-demise-journalism</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I just finished writing my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/not-review-cult-of-the-amateur&quot;&gt;non-review of The Cult of the Amateur&lt;/a&gt; when I found  that Carr&#039;s at it too.  Nicholas Carr of course.  Apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/10/the_amorality_o.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;he too believes &lt;/a&gt;blogging is going to lead to the demise of professional journalism.  What is it with otherwise intelligent people that they have to extrapolate a trend linearly to an apocalyptic conclusion?  It shows a complete failure to grasp even the basics of systems theory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/nicholas-carr-and-demise-journalism&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/nicholas-carr-and-demise-journalism#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1322</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:10:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1322 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not a review of Cult of the Amateur</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/not-review-cult-of-the-amateur</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1334&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Months ago I set out to read &lt;em&gt;Cult of the Amateur&lt;/em&gt;, by Andrew Keen, Doubleday 2007.  I want to review this book but I can&#039;t because it makes me so angry I can&#039;t finish it.  I fling it across the room and leave it for weeks before I try again.  So far I&#039;ve made to page 19.  I can&#039;t recall when I last read such an irrationally emotive, ill-informed, unbalanced diatribe.  I even include here my own writings.  What makes it worse is that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/folly-crowd&quot;&gt;my own opinions&lt;/a&gt; are not that far from the author&#039;s - I should be a cheerleader.  But he just talks crap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/not-review-cult-of-the-amateur&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/not-review-cult-of-the-amateur#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1291</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/231">book review</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:46:54 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1291 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Limiting the Crowd to their own time at their own expense: the open community&#039;s distate for commerce</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/limiting-crowd-their-own-time-their-own-expense-op</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Recently we looked at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/folly-crowd&quot;&gt;the Folly of the Crowd&lt;/a&gt;: how in all but the largest of online communities the supposed consensus community content is actually created by a fanatical few.  This is made worse by the online world&#039;s distaste of people making a living.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/limiting-crowd-their-own-time-their-own-expense-op&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/limiting-crowd-their-own-time-their-own-expense-op#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1213</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/167">open content</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/18">open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:15:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1213 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The twittering classes</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/twittering-classes</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s the big deal with Twitter?  As far as I can see it is a mechanism to allow large quantities of low value noise into your life while at the same time being a device for ego stroking.  No I&#039;m not interested in your every idle non-thought, and I don&#039;t need to feed my ego hourly.  And it doesn&#039;t work very well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/twittering-classes&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/twittering-classes#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1172</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/172">twitter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:06:52 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1172 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Overcoming the Folly of the Crowd</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/overcoming-folly-crowd</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/folly-crowd&quot;&gt;a previous post&lt;/a&gt; we looked at excitement - hype even - about the potential for Web 2.0, in particular what is known as the Wisdom of the Crowd.  But majority does not equal truth.  Voting is good for social decision making but not for advancing knowledge.  It isn’t even a majority anyway that fills the forums and blogs and wikis.  It is the voice of a fanatical few.  And the Crowd equates fame with wisdom.  The Crowd also fails to discriminate between sources of information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/overcoming-folly-crowd&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/overcoming-folly-crowd#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1178</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:29:10 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1178 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Folly of the Crowd</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/folly-crowd</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is much excitement about the potential for Web 2.0, in particular what is known as the Wisdom of the Crowd.  Wikipedia becomes the repository of all knowledge, Google search statistics are the zeitgeist of the times and MySpace is the face of the world.  Page rank is a measure of authority.  Corporations appeal to the public for solutions to problems. The ivory tower is replaced by the democracy of the commons; the proclamations of the cathedral displaced by the hubbub of the bazaar.  Not so fast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/folly-crowd&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/folly-crowd#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1177</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/43">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:51:29 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1177 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

