<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>certification</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Free PRINCE2 practice exams - a list of sources on the internet</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/free-prince2-practice-exams</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/free-prince2-practice-exams&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/free-prince2-practice-exams#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2048</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:33:01 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2048 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL exam transparency</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-exam-transaprency</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing a &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; target =&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;series of reforms&lt;/a&gt;, APMG has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itil-officialsite.com/News/ExamStats.asp&quot; target =&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;released the ITIL exam statistics&lt;/a&gt; for the last three years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-exam-transaprency&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-exam-transaprency#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1966</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:18:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1966 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Over a million ITILers</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/over-million-itilers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Recent ITIL certification stats &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.exin.org/Content/News/~/media/Documents/ITIL%20Marketing%20Numbers%20with%20pass%20rates%20version%20June%20%20%20pdf.ashx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;published by EXIN&lt;/a&gt; that originate from APMG show clearly that over quarter of a million ITIL certifications  are issued every year (extrapolating the 9 months of stats).  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;200,000 of them are V2 and V3 Foundations.  V3 Foundations outnumber V2 Foundations by about 6:1.  So every year we certify another 200k ITILers.  Think about it: three years of V3 certs, plus a decade of V2 certs.  There was a rumour a while ago on twitter that we&#039;d passed the million.  I have no doubt it was true. As Mythbusters would say: &quot;plausible&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/over-million-itilers&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/over-million-itilers#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1923</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:25:26 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1923 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rant vs counter-rant: the ITIL V3 Certification Scheme</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/rant-vs-counter-rant-itil-v3-certification-scheme</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Pierre Bernard over at Pink Elephant had a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/index.php?/itilv3/comments/personal_rant_about_people_complaining_about_the_itil_v3_scheme1/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;personal rant&quot;&lt;/a&gt; about &quot;people «complaining» about the ITIL® V3 scheme&quot; and &quot;much negativity presently in various blogs and social media sites about the ITIL® v3 scheme&quot;.   That&#039;d be me, for one, so I feel compelled to comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/rant-vs-counter-rant-itil-v3-certification-scheme&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/rant-vs-counter-rant-itil-v3-certification-scheme#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1900</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:51:28 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1900 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Castle ITIL further degrade the standards of ITIL V3 certification and training</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/apmg-further-degrade-standards-itil-v3-certificati</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is confirmed from multiple sources that APMG have raised the number of students per instructor for ITIL V3 Intermediate courses from 12 to 18.  [Update: well strictly speaking I shouldn&#039;t blame APMG, it is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/661&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;almost invisible IQB&lt;/a&gt;, the murky body that represents all the snouts at the trough of training (and not to be confused with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmfi.org/content/international-qualifications-certifications-esc-iqc&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;itSMFI&#039;s International Qualifications &amp;amp; Certifications ESC - the IQC)&lt;/a&gt;]. This is clearly recognition that ITIL V3 certification is not about teaching people anything, and will serve only to reduce the perceived market value of an ITIL Intermediate certification.  Add to that the fact that this has not been announced to the public (as far as I can detect) and you can see that ITIL certification is all about the industry not the customer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/apmg-further-degrade-standards-itil-v3-certificati&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/apmg-further-degrade-standards-itil-v3-certificati#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1885</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/31">training</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:58:47 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1885 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How many ITIL Examination Institutes is enough?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/how-many-itil-examination-institutes-enough</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itil-officialsite.com/News/NewAccreditedITILExaminationInstitute_PEOPLECERT.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;an announcement last week&lt;/a&gt;, APMG have appointed a ninth Examination Institute.   Readers will recall these are the companies that are licensed by APMG and in turn accredit all the 350+ training organisations delivering ITIL training.  The EIs also administer the exams using standardised question content but their own tests and their own delivery systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/how-many-itil-examination-institutes-enough&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/how-many-itil-examination-institutes-enough#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1854</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 13:44:12 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1854 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why the difference in numbers between PinkVerify and OGC ITIL product certifications?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-difference-numbers-between-pinkverify-and-ogc-</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There appears to be more vendors certifying their products against more processes  on PinkVerify than the OGC scheme.   Why is that?  What can OGC learn from Pink about making it easier for vendors?  or does it show that PinkVerify is too easy?  Does it matter?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/why-difference-numbers-between-pinkverify-and-ogc-&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-difference-numbers-between-pinkverify-and-ogc-#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1840</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/147">technology</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:04:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1840 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Master certification announced</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-master-certification-announced</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;APMG &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itil-officialsite.com/Qualifications/ITILV3QualificationLevels/ITILV3MasterQualification.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;have annnounced&lt;/a&gt; the ITIL Master certification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-master-certification-announced&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-master-certification-announced#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1753</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:58:12 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1753 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Open letter to ITIL Qualifications Board</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/open-letter-itil-qualifications-board</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today we have a guest post from Peter Gerritsen who has written a letter to the ITIL Qualifications Board proposing some changes to the ITIL V3 qualifications scheme.  I told him he has a snowflake&#039;s chance in Hell given what they went through to get the scheme to this point (I have plenty of experience of hammering on the doors of Castle ITIL).  We are interested in your views:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/open-letter-itil-qualifications-board&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/open-letter-itil-qualifications-board#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1719</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:34:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pjotrg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1719 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pass the ITIL V3 Foundation exam in six easy and (almost) free steps</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/pass-itil-v3-foundation-exam-six-easy-and-free-ste</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you know something about IT operations (not just development) and your IQ is in triple figures then passing the ITIL V3 Foundation exam should be no big deal and no big investment.  (If in doubt, read the testimonials in the comments below).  Follow these &lt;strike&gt;six&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strike&gt;nine&lt;/strike&gt; eight steps:&lt;br /&gt;
 [updated 25/3/2011  ]  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/pass-itil-v3-foundation-exam-six-easy-and-free-ste&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/pass-itil-v3-foundation-exam-six-easy-and-free-ste#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1613</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/31">training</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:42:14 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1613 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

