<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>APMG</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 Certification via online training is back on again</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-certification-online-training-back-again</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Call of a crow!!*   What is going on in Castle ITIL?   Is there a battle royal between vendor factions?  The whole V3 Certification thing is lurching around like a pantomime donkey where the front guy has flatulence.  Start of August it is confirmed from a good source that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/716&quot;&gt;online training will not be possible&lt;/a&gt; for ITIL V3 course above Foundations level.  It is in writing to some training providers that this is the case.  End of August, e-learning is back in the syllabus.  Apart from being very hard to keep up with, this leads to a dire prediction for ATOs if Castle ITIL decides to cut out the middleman...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-certification-online-training-back-again&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-certification-online-training-back-again#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:15:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1187 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public review of the ITIL V3 Foundation Syllabus: who knew?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;APMG have just run an anonymous public survey for &quot;your valuable feedback&quot; on the ITIL V3 Foundation Syllabus.   Who knew?  Oh, come on!   You had a whole five days to hear about it and respond.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/31">training</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 22:58:56 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1158 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Foundation is the ONLY V3 exam that is going to be on Prometric</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/716</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic has confirmed pretty reliably that ITIL V3 Intermediate and Expert exams will NOT be available online without an associated training course.  [updated: no it isn&#039;t.  things changed between the start and end of August.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1187&quot;&gt;Online training is back on!&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/716&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/716#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:53:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">716 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Feedback on the ITIL V3 manager&#039;s bridge exam</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/702</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The ITIL V3 examinations are seriously flawed.  &quot;Subjective&quot; and &quot;multi-choice&quot; don&#039;t go together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/702&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/702#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 22:34:23 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">702 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Just how does itSMF involve the members?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/660</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Just how does itSMF involve the members?  What does itSMF International do for international communications?  How did the ITIL Qualifications Board survey the ITIL &quot;community&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/660&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/660#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/31">training</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:58:13 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">660 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>APMG got its accreditation back</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/596</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Talk about timing.   The IT Skeptic hears that, within a day or so of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/580&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this blog&lt;/a&gt;, APMG &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ukas.com/about_accreditation/accredited_bodies/certification_body_schedules.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;got its accreditation back&lt;/a&gt; (look under &quot;t&quot; for &quot;The APM Group&quot;).  Congratulations.   Even the most strident of APMG critics must be sympathetic about having to wend the byzantine pathways of bureaucracy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/596&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/596#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:49:40 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">596 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Another ITIL Examination Institute accredited by APMG</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/580</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The EXIN-and-ASEB (British Computer Society) stranglehold on ITIL certification slips even further away with the accreditation of a sixth Examination Institute (EI) by APMG, the OGC&#039;s outsourced official accreditation body.  This despite the fact that APMG remains embarassingly without its own accreditation withdrawn by the British Government for six months now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/580&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/580#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:38:25 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">580 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Three months later, APMG accreditation still suspended</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/450</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/407&quot;&gt;broke the news&lt;/a&gt; that APMG had been suspended by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three months later, APMG accreditation &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ukas.com/Library/downloads/web_schedules/CB/Product/0126Product%20Certification_SUSP.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;still suspended&lt;/a&gt;.  This is obviously not a brief tiff to be resolved overnight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/450&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/450#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:22:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">450 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>APMG look set for some spectacular acrobatics over ITIL accreditation</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/407</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Further to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/401&quot;&gt;the spot of bother APMG find themselves in&lt;/a&gt; with their &quot;accreditation auditors&quot; the UKAS, investigation reveals the suspension is a fact.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This blog is (currently) ITIL-centric, so most readers will be interested that I believe ITIL is not covered by the suspension.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/407&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/407#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:55:36 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">407 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Important ITIL certification news: APMG&#039;s accreditation by UKAS has been suspended</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/401</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Can any reader offer something more substantial than speculation to explain why The APM Group has had their accreditation by the UK Accreditation Service suspended?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;APMG are the accreditor of all examination bodies for ITIL (and Prince2 and ...).  They have had &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ukas.com/about_accreditation/accredited_bodies/certification_body_schedules.asp&quot;&gt;their accreditation suspended&lt;/a&gt; in both categories:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/401&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/401#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:51:09 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">401 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
