<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>federation</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/55</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The CMDB Federation proceeeds at its usual glacial pace</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/603</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The CMDB Federation was formed in April 2006 by CMDB vendors so they could tell people they were moving towards a common standard of interoperability, known in the CMDB world as &quot;federation&quot;, so the group is called the Federation.  Two years later what have we got to show?  Glacial advance.  That&#039;s the way the vendors want it.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/603&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/603#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/55">federation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:31:21 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">603 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The CMDB Federation releases its federation specification for public review</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/328</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The CMDB Federation has released &quot;version 0.95&quot; draft specification of the standard for federation (read: interoperability) between CMDBs and similar operational software. This specification will make quite an impact on the IT operations software market once it is finished... but it isn&#039;t yet, not by a long way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/328&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/328#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/55">federation</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:21:20 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">328 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The CMDB Federation lumbers on</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/220</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For those of you who have been losing sleep over it, latests news on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://cmdbf.org&quot; target=&quot;new&quot;&gt;CMDB Federation&lt;/a&gt; has it inching towards a standard for CMDB federation.  [Go on, click the Federation link: kinda says it all really].  According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/115&quot; target=&quot;new&quot;&gt;one HP developer&#039;s blog&lt;/a&gt;, the group has moved beyond UML to XML and are now coding in preparation for an &quot;interop&quot; when they will test their tools together.  They should sell tickets.  I for one would pay to see BMC, CA, Fujitsu, HP, IBM and Microsoft all discussing who is out of synch if it doesn&#039;t work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/220&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/220#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/55">federation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 03:07:55 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">220 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
