<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>professionalism</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/56</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>IT professionalism</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/it-professionalism</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Worldwide there is an overall IT professional accreditation spreading, in the UK (CITP), Europe, the USA, Australia and other places.  Not before time.&lt;br /&gt;
For too long IT managers have accepted poor documentation, subverted change control and general ill-discipline from IT technical staff simply because they held the sacred knowledge about the technology under their care.&lt;br /&gt;
The understanding is emerging that the long-term health of IT depends more on professional behaviour: good process, good data, good record-keeping… a good culture amongst the staff.  There is less patience with the prima-donnas and the cowboys.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/it-professionalism&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/it-professionalism#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1374</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/236">cowboys</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/124">culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/56">professionalism</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:24:32 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1374 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Building complex people systems</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1079</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When we speak of a new profession(alism), could it be that by focusing on IT we are focusing on the wrong thing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1079&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1079#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1079</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/56">professionalism</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:53:22 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1079 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My first ITIL spam.  ITSM is going to the dogs.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/221</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As one more item in the growing pile of evidence that the ITIL community has become the ITIL industry - that professional decorum is giving way to avarice - I just received my first ITIL spam.  Whilst it makes a change from modifying my reproductive capabilities, it is none the less spam, and the fact that it comes from a reputable company is all the more disappointing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/221&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/221#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/221</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/56">professionalism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/22">spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:53:55 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">221 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

