<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>BMC</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>BMC&#039;s own CMDB figures - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the original post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713&quot;&gt;a back-of-an-envelope re-analysis of Forrester and BMC&#039;s own CMDB research&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several readers argue well that ROI is not the right measure for a CMDB, but nevertheless management want to know what they get for their money, and BMC&#039;s own research suggests &quot;not much&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1075/bmc_cmdb_figures.mp3" length="4017462" type="audio/x-mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>9:32</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:17:15 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1075 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>a back-of-an-envelope re-analysis of Forrester and BMC&#039;s own CMDB research</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several readers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/712#comment-3241&quot;&gt;argue well&lt;/a&gt; that ROI is not the right measure for a CMDB, but nevertheless management want to know what they get for their money, and BMC&#039;s own research suggests &quot;not much&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:23:24 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">713 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Crap Factoid Alert: CMDB savings of more than $1 million per year </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-left&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/528&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/chokey_extreme.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image image-preview&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;152&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/722&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;background-color:red;&quot;&gt;This is a CATEGORY 1 Crap Factoid alert from Chokey the Chimp at the IT Skeptic&#039;s Crap Factoid Warning Service.  &lt;strong&gt;THIS IS NOT A DRILL&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;  Be on EXTREME danger alert for CF &quot;CMDB savings of more than $1 million per year&quot;.  BMC and Forrester are shovelling it. [Update: more on this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:31:38 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">709 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Malcolm Fry swaps sides</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/413</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Malcolm Fry, who has been BMC&#039;s ITIL &quot;thought leader&quot; since they acquired Remedy, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkhdi.com/hdi2008/session.aspx?SessionID=1015&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;is billed at&lt;/a&gt; the 2008 HDI conference as &quot;Executive Consultant to CA&quot;.   Seems he&#039;s been over to the dark side &lt;a href=&quot;http://itsmf-tampabay.org/WordPress/?p=78&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;for a little while&lt;/a&gt;.  Well well well.  I wonder what Beemer think about that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/413#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/117">CA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:01:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">413 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Magic happens.  BMC promise some magic ITIL.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/229</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;People want to believe that &quot;magic happens&quot; [why is that bumper sticker so often on cars that look like not much magic happened to them?].  Vendors know this and exploit it by selling magic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BMC&#039;s Ken Turbitt recently put out a paper &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bmc.com/USA/Communities/attachments/BMC_BPWP_ITIL.pdf&quot; target=&quot;new&quot;&gt;&quot;can you really get ITIL out of the box?&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/229&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/229#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:32:18 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">229 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
