<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>CMDB</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>In ITIL, an SLA is a set of SLTs</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-sla-set-slts</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In ITIL, a Service Level Agreement is a set of Service Level Targets.  Somebody please tell the vendors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-sla-set-slts&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-sla-set-slts#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/170">service level</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:21:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1211 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On demand CMDB</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/demand-cmdb</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As promised in a comment recently, I have published &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;an article on ITSM Watch&lt;/a&gt; about &quot;on-demand CMDB&quot;.  The idea is that we only need to keep a minimum of data in the CMDB and we assemble the rest as needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/demand-cmdb&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/demand-cmdb#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:43:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1217 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Those who would promote CMDB should promote CMDB</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/those-who-would-promote-cmdb-should-promote-cmdb</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Much of what we read about CMDB is actually singing the praises of asset management, network discovery or other simpler technologies.  Other benefits attributed to CMDB actually come from process improvement and do not depend on the technology at all.  When all you want to sell is a hammer...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/those-who-would-promote-cmdb-should-promote-cmdb&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/those-who-would-promote-cmdb-should-promote-cmdb#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:14:50 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1173 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITSM Watch reaches new skeptical heights on CMDB</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsm-watch-reaches-new-skeptical-heights-cmdb</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmwatch.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ITSM Watch&lt;/a&gt; might do me out of business soon...  but it is great to see some good IT skepticism. [Updated: fixed a link]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itsm-watch-reaches-new-skeptical-heights-cmdb&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsm-watch-reaches-new-skeptical-heights-cmdb#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:36:42 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1212 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Crap Factoid Alert: one third of sites have completed a CMDB</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alert-one-third-sites-have-completed-</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/chokey.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image image-preview&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;152&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Here is a high Crap Factoid alert &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/528&quot;&gt;from Chokey the Chimp&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
We recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/732&quot;&gt;demolished the EMA paper&lt;/a&gt; on CMDB adoption but nevertheless the paper in question is being &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bitaplanet.com/article.php/3774576&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;misquoted by bITaPlanet&lt;/a&gt; as saying that &quot;there’s been a dramatic jump in the number of companies that have completed their CMDB, from just 9 percent in 2006 to one-third in 2008&quot;.  This is nonsense but it is nonsense that is now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stacksafe.com/blog/the-balance-between-cmdb-and-roi/10/14/2008/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;turning up elsewhere&lt;/a&gt;.  Be on alert and keep the CFirehose ready. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alert-one-third-sites-have-completed-&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alert-one-third-sites-have-completed-#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/130">Crap Factoid</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:49:32 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1203 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My kind of CMDB</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-kind-cmdb</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=326162&amp;amp;source=rss_news50&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Don Tennant pointed out&lt;/a&gt;, ITSM is not the most exciting subject.  Some days I&#039;m just over it.  On those days, this is my kind of CMDB: the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.concoursmondial.be/concours-mondial/wijn-nl/cmb_page.asp?pag_ID=164&amp;amp;lng_id=EN&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Concours Mondial de Bruxelles&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/my-kind-cmdb&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-kind-cmdb#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:09:03 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1152 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google Trends is always interesting</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-trends-always-interesting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I got whipped in the stock market bubble like many people, so I&#039;m the last to read too much into graphs any more, but nevertheless I always find &lt;a href=&quot;http://trends.google.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Google Trends&lt;/a&gt; interesting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/google-trends-always-interesting&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-trends-always-interesting#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:13:08 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1131 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What do all the sites without a CMDB do? - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1162</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the orginal post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1123&quot;&gt;What do all the sites without a CMDB do?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are some fundamental fallacies behind the arguments for CMDB and a recent article encapsulated a number of them. Why do we keep getting told a CMDB is essential when almost nobody has one?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1162/sites_without_a_cmdb.mp3" length="4400182" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>10:27</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1162#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 04:02:25 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1162 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What do all the sites without a CMDB do?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1123</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1162&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are some fundamental fallacies behind the arguments for CMDB and a recent article encapsulated a number of them.  Why do we keep getting told a CMDB is essential when almost nobody has one?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1123&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1123#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:16:01 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1123 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CMDB for free</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1100</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You can have CMDB for free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1100&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1100#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/18">open source</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:59:10 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1100 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
