<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>ISACA</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How to assemble all the ITSM reference library you need for $211</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/how-assemble-all-itsm-reference-library-you-need-2</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With seemingly everyone gouging the ITIL user these days, is there an alternative for those of us who can&#039;t just (or just can&#039;t) get the boss to pay &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-live-still-coming-and-very-expensive&quot;&gt;the exorbitant prices&lt;/a&gt;?   You bet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/how-assemble-all-itsm-reference-library-you-need-2&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/how-assemble-all-itsm-reference-library-you-need-2#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/127">publications</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:19:37 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1182 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The ITIL V3 - COBIT V4.1 mapping white paper is available and no wonder noone is saying much</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1109</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The long awaited ITIL V3 - COBIT V4.1 mapping white paper is available ... for a price.  This is the final paper in a long-awaited series that answer the question left unanswered by the ITIL V3 books - how does ITIL relate to the standards and frameworks around it?   The answer is that ITIL is very much a subset of COBIT&#039;s more comprehensive coverage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1109&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1109#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:21:17 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1109 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL vs. COBIT, ISO20000 et al, and itSMF&#039;s role in promoting them.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/447</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;itSMF exists as a marketing arm of the ITSM industry, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/217&quot;&gt;by definition&lt;/a&gt;.  An open market is a wonderfully self-levelling system: money flows where the potential money is.  So itSMF forms a very good indicator of where the interest or &#039;action&#039; is in ITSM at the time.  Right now it is ITIL.   But what about the future? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/447&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/447#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:12:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">447 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>itSMF and ISACA: like chalk and cheese.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/433</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/472&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you missed this month&#039;s edition of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/newsletter/subscriptions&quot;&gt;the Skeptical Informer&lt;/a&gt;, you missed some scuttlebutt about why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmf.org&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the itSMF International website&lt;/a&gt; has hastily gone off the air.  The circus continues - all part of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/411&quot;&gt;an endless litany&lt;/a&gt; of mis-management, spats, dodgy deals and mis-governance through 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By way of contrast, it is interesting to reflect that in the past two months &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isaca.org&quot;&gt;ISACA&lt;/a&gt; has, for me personally as a member, done the following: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/433&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/433#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:18:38 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">433 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Brother ISACA</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/369</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;SPAN class=&quot;inline right&quot;&gt;&lt;IMG class=&quot;image thumbnail&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/brothers_canstockphoto0653066.preview.jpg&quot; width=200&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;ISACA and itSMF can do more together.  There is a great deal of synergy between our organisations and very little overlap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/369&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/369#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:45:18 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">369 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>We get the governance we deserve: what to do about itSMF?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/339</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Nations get the government they deserve, and so too do organisations.  If members don&#039;t mind the itSMF being the OGC&#039;s pet monkey or a carnival of prancing vendors, then they can just leave it to slide. If the people don&#039;t rise up and say &quot;enough&quot; then it gets worse.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A reader asks &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/337#comment-1485&quot;&gt;What is it you wish members to do&lt;/a&gt; [about itSMF]?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/339&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/339#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/101">governance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 04:05:33 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">339 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The commercialisation of ITIL: a slow boiling of the frog</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/245</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/244#comment-1168&quot;&gt;recent comment&lt;/a&gt; said &quot;Why is everyone banging on about the commercial aspects of this refresh?...it&#039;s been commercial for years.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Indeed ITIL has been commercial for years.  But it has beeen a slow boiling of the frog.  The unseemly scrabbling around version 3 has made obvious a trend that has indeed been going on for longer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/245&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/245#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:03:08 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">245 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
