<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>V3</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL 2011 persists with the dangerous concept of supporting services</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not only has ITIL V3.1 2011 not fixed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-services-are-customer-facing-whatever-catalog&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the problems with business-vs-technical services&lt;/a&gt;, they have gone the wrong way and reinforced the problem.  I will fight to the death to say there is no such thing as internal supporting &quot;services&quot;, because I care about ITSM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-persists-dangerous-concept-supporting-se#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2070</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/186">service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:43:55 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2070 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My how ITIL has grown: the size of the new ITIL V3 2011</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We have more news on ITIL &lt;strike&gt;V3.1&lt;/strike&gt; V3 &quot;2011 Edition&quot;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmfi.org/content/itil-2011-book-details-tso&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;from itSMF International&lt;/a&gt;.  Of most note is the extraordinary increase in the size of ITIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2049</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 04:18:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2049 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL V3 2011: a new book and four new processes</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-2011-new-book-and-four-new-processes</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s discuss the only information we have about the upcoming ITIL V3 2011: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.best-management-practice.com/gempdf/ITIL_UPdate_FAQs_Summer_2011_June11.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this FAQ&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-2011-new-book-and-four-new-processes&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-v3-2011-new-book-and-four-new-processes#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2042</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:18:44 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2042 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why ITIL V3 2011 matters and how OGC, TSO and APMG aren&#039;t helping</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-itil-v3-2011-matters-and-how-ogc-tso-and-apmg-</link>
 <description>&lt;div style=&quot;float: left; padding:1em;&quot;  &gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/thumbs/castle_canstockphoto0347456.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Image&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;small&gt;© canstockphoto.com &lt;/small&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On July 29 2011 we will get the update to ITIL V3.  There are calls for us to just relax and stop worrying about ITIL V3 2011.  Those unconcerned by changes to ITIL are those immersed in it: the experts, the consultants, the trainers. The other million users of ITIL can&#039;t keep track of all the differences between V2, V3, and V3 2011. They don&#039;t have the time or the interest (or the means).  Right now they are confused and uncertain.  And Castle ITIL aren&#039;t helping.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/why-itil-v3-2011-matters-and-how-ogc-tso-and-apmg-&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-itil-v3-2011-matters-and-how-ogc-tso-and-apmg-#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2043</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/270">2011</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:30:42 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2043 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;ITIL 2011&quot; will replace &quot;ITIL 2007&quot; on 29 July 2011. V3 is dead, long live V3</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-will-replace-itil-2007-29-july-2011-v3-d</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;According to an &quot;Elert&quot; email from TSO, &quot;ITIL 2011&quot; will replace &quot;ITIL 2007&quot; on 29 July 2011. I can find no official announcement of this date on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.best-management-practice.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;OGC &quot;Official ITIL&quot; website&lt;/a&gt;, nor  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tsoshop.co.uk/bookstore.asp?FO=40152&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;TSO&lt;/a&gt;.  Odd.  Premature elertication?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-will-replace-itil-2007-29-july-2011-v3-d&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-will-replace-itil-2007-29-july-2011-v3-d#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2041</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:29:52 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2041 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Its official, this is Version 3 of ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/its-official-version-3-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Do you realise that the moniker &quot;V3&quot; is finally official?  For years OGC and TSO refused to label it V3.  There is nothing on the front of the ITIL books (or inside them!) to tell you which is V3 or V2 (or V1).  It must be hopelessly confusing to anyone new to it.  But now that has all changed...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/its-official-version-3-itil&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/its-official-version-3-itil#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1980</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:56:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1980 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Book(s) review: the Key Element Guides</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/books-review-key-element-guides</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The ITIL V3 Key Element Guides have been out for some time now.  Seems I never finished and published a review I started writing long ago, sorry about that.  Better late than never, here it is now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/books-review-key-element-guides&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/books-review-key-element-guides#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1142</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/127">publications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:42:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1142 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rant vs counter-rant: the ITIL V3 Certification Scheme</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/rant-vs-counter-rant-itil-v3-certification-scheme</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Pierre Bernard over at Pink Elephant had a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/index.php?/itilv3/comments/personal_rant_about_people_complaining_about_the_itil_v3_scheme1/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;personal rant&quot;&lt;/a&gt; about &quot;people «complaining» about the ITIL® V3 scheme&quot; and &quot;much negativity presently in various blogs and social media sites about the ITIL® v3 scheme&quot;.   That&#039;d be me, for one, so I feel compelled to comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/rant-vs-counter-rant-itil-v3-certification-scheme&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/rant-vs-counter-rant-itil-v3-certification-scheme#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1900</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/24">Pink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:51:28 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1900 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Remarkably frank, but what are the benefits of the ITIL V3 Update?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/remarkably-frank-what-are-benefits-itil-v3-update</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;itSMF International have released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmfi.org/content/itil®-v3-update-what-are-benefits&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a remarkably frank document describing the ITIL V3 Update&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s also a bit odd: it carries the banner of itSMFI but it is unsigned and undated.  And it doesn&#039;t answer the question it poses: &quot;ITIL® V3 Update, what are the benefits?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/remarkably-frank-what-are-benefits-itil-v3-update&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/remarkably-frank-what-are-benefits-itil-v3-update#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1895</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/30">Refresh</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:54:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1895 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL product compliance criteria are no longer a secret</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-product-compliance-criteria-are-no-longer-sec</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;APMG have done the right thing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itil-officialsite.com/News/ITIL_Software_Scheme_Mandatory_Assessment_Criteria.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;by publishing the assessment criteria for ITIL compliance&lt;/a&gt;.  I was tempted to say they had no option because the arrangement was so absurd.  And it probably was the silliest thing in the ITIL world&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-product-compliance-criteria-are-no-longer-sec&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-product-compliance-criteria-are-no-longer-sec#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1886</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/102">compliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 01:30:25 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1886 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

