<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>IBM</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/7</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>IBM draws that long ITIL bow again</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/186</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;IBM just can&#039;t get over the fact they dropped the ball on ITIL, can they?  &lt;a href=&quot;ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/whitepapers/EMA-ITUP.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Here is yet another claim&lt;/a&gt; that stretches the truth to the point of distortion:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;IBM is a founding member of the ITIL research committee and still actively involved in the support and creation of new library materials including ITIL, Version 3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/186&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/186#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/7">IBM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 21:35:18 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">186 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IBM wrote ITIL.  In fact Alasdair Meldrum did</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/145</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Just when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/143&quot;&gt;I say that all the hype is in CMDB&lt;/a&gt; and that ITIL in general is ticking along fairly soberly, along comes someone to prove me wrong.  Two people actually: someone hyping their own significance; and what passes for a journalist on the web these days uncritically lapping it up. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/145&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/145#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/7">IBM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/40">In the blog</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/4">VOIP</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:18:45 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">145 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IBM: the company with such a firm grasp of ITIL strategic issues that they sold their service desk</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/29</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is it just me or does anyone else think it is a bit rich &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmwatch.com/itil/article.php/3618271&quot;&gt;IBM lecturing ITIL vendors&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After all, this is the company with such a firm grasp of ITIL strategic issues that they sold their service desk product to Peregrine, abandoned to an inevitable brutal death.  That&#039;s a bit like GM getting out of making engines and then telling other auto makers what they need to make cars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/29&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/29#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/7">IBM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 01:41:20 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
