<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>ROI</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/8</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL business case: find the money</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/546</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-right&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imageskeptic/dollars_shaved_canstockphoto0046984.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image image-preview&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;145&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;There is much discussion of which processes to start with in ITIL, or what order to do them in, or whether to do them at all, or how to decide.  If the decision on which processes to reengineer is driven by a business case then the right ones will be chosen: those where ITIL will yield a return to the business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;FTM: Find The Money&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/546&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/546#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/137">business case</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/8">ROI</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 03:46:03 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">546 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When you don&#039;t run IT - The IT Skeptic</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/114</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a podcast of the original article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/46&quot;&gt;&quot;When you don&#039;t run IT as a business, the inevitable results: bad business decisions&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/114&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/114/when_you_dont_run_IT_as_a_business.mp3" length="2063012" type="audio/mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>4:54</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/114#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/8">ROI</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:29:08 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">114 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Busines cases are so simple: give the decisionmaker what they want</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/78</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When you are building a business case for ITIL (or anything), it doesn&#039;t matter if it is intangible Value or $$$Return that the proposal is offering if that is not what the business wants at this time.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/78&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/78#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/8">ROI</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:40:41 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When you don&#039;t run IT as a business, the inevitable results: bad business decisions.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/46</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This article has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/114&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.datamation.com/showpost.php?p=2960&amp;amp;postcount=7&quot;&gt;An insightful remark at the IT Managment Forum&lt;/a&gt; set off today&#039;s train of thought:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/46&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/46#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/8">ROI</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:58:29 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Many ITIL projects are overcapitalised renovations</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/24</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have been discussing ITIL ROI with the Spanish ITIL community, via &lt;a href=&quot;http://gobiernotic.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Antonio Valle&#039;s blog with the magnificent name &quot;Gobierno de las TIC. Conocimiento Adquirido&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.  I was asked the question “How is the relationship between an architectural project and a house?”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unless one is setting up a data centre from scratch, I don&#039;t think the architect analogy fits.  An ITIL adoption is usually more like renovations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/24&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/24#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/8">ROI</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 04:05:27 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If IT ain’t broke don’t fix it.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/23</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This article has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/76&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perhaps the saddest sight in the ITIL world is organisations that adopt ITIL processes when the old ones were working OK.  Don’t tell me it doesn’t happen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/23&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/23#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/8">ROI</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 04:31:14 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Emperor has no clothes. Where is the evidence for ITIL?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/21</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This article has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/75&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since this is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itilskeptic.org/node/3&quot;&gt;skeptical&lt;/a&gt; blog, it is high time we examined the evidence.  Where is the evidence for the benefits of ITIL?  There isn’t any.  Not the kind of hard empirical evidence that would stand up in, say, clinical trials.  There is more evidence for quack alternative medicines than there is for ITIL. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/21&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/21#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/113">research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/8">ROI</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:08:00 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
