value

McKinsey on how CIOs should think about business value

skeptic — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:52:28 -0600

For those who can afford $150 annual subscription this McKinsey article looks useful: How CIOs should think about business value.

(Incidentally you will get at least as much value for your money from a McKinsey premium subscription as you will by paying TWENTY FIVE times that much for ITIL Live. Makes an interesting comparison doesn't it?)

For those who are skint like me McKinsey kindly give a lot away from their teasers:

Do you need to do ITIL? Wrong question

skeptic — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:14:37 -0600

We can do without all this angst about "Should we do ITIL?" That is the last question we should ask ourselves.

Considering ITIL? Ignore ROI that other organisations have achieved

skeptic — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:49:07 -0600

Research on ITIL ROI would be a useful thing for the general information of the industry, but if you are considering whether or not to adopt ITIL, any ROI information you can find now is useless.

ITIL business case: find the money

skeptic — Sun, 11 May 2008 03:46:03 -0600

There is much discussion of which processes to start with in ITIL, or what order to do them in, or whether to do them at all, or how to decide. If the decision on which processes to reengineer is driven by a business case then the right ones will be chosen: those where ITIL will yield a return to the business.
FTM: Find The Money.

When you don't run IT - The IT Skeptic

skeptic — Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:29:08 -0700

This is a podcast of the original article: "When you don't run IT as a business, the inevitable results: bad business decisions".

Busines cases are so simple: give the decisionmaker what they want

skeptic — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:40:41 -0700

When you are building a business case for ITIL (or anything), it doesn't matter if it is intangible Value or $$$Return that the proposal is offering if that is not what the business wants at this time.

When you don't run IT as a business, the inevitable results: bad business decisions.

skeptic — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:58:29 -0600

This article has been podcast

An insightful remark at the IT Managment Forum set off today's train of thought:

Many ITIL projects are overcapitalised renovations

skeptic — Sat, 24 Jun 2006 04:05:27 -0600

I have been discussing ITIL ROI with the Spanish ITIL community, via Antonio Valle's blog with the magnificent name "Gobierno de las TIC. Conocimiento Adquirido". I was asked the question “How is the relationship between an architectural project and a house?”.

Unless one is setting up a data centre from scratch, I don't think the architect analogy fits. An ITIL adoption is usually more like renovations.

If IT ain’t broke don’t fix it.

skeptic — Tue, 13 Jun 2006 04:31:14 -0600

This article has been podcast

Perhaps the saddest sight in the ITIL world is organisations that adopt ITIL processes when the old ones were working OK. Don’t tell me it doesn’t happen.

The Emperor has no clothes. Where is the evidence for ITIL?

skeptic — Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:08:00 -0600

This article has been podcast

Since this is a skeptical blog, it is high time we examined the evidence. Where is the evidence for the benefits of ITIL? There isn’t any. Not the kind of hard empirical evidence that would stand up in, say, clinical trials. There is more evidence for quack alternative medicines than there is for ITIL.