<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>cult</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/9</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The cure for the common cult of &quot;ITIL by the book&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/42</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What a great line: &quot;the cure for the common cult&quot;.  Oooh, I wish I had thought of that, but I didn&#039;t.  It comes from &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchcio.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid19_gci1211252,00.html&quot;&gt;a recent article by Brian Johnson&lt;/a&gt;, one of the original authors of ITIL and an occasional contributor of comments on this blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/42&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/42#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/9">cult</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:17:45 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The march of ITIL zealots</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/20</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today let&#039;s look closer at the recent survey I quoted previously.  We will discuss the lack of decent empirical evidence for ITIL in a subsequent blog.  Vendor surveys are a poor substitute (I know, I worked for one), but when they are all we have then we should at least listen to them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sadly I don&#039;t think I can include Evergreen in my Circle of ITIL Skeptics, but they undoubtedly take a mature and rational approach to ITIL:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Which industry standards are relevant to my organization and which are redundant?&lt;br /&gt;
How do I get started? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/20&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/20#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/9">cult</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:24:17 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL the cult</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/17</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This article has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/67&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have seen that the ITIL movement has distinct overtones of a fad.  What about a cult?  A group that defines its own measure of good and bad by comparing against its own internal reference books then declares that those books hold the key to getting from bad to good sounds mighty like a cult to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A colleague gave me a model that I shall call the Skeptical Maturity Model for Technology Adoption.  It has four phases
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Idea&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Product&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Wave&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Religion&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/17&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/17#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/9">cult</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:13:19 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL the fad</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/13</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the big dangers ITIL faces is being taken for a fad due to the wild enthusiasms it is generating.   OK the word “wild” hardly applies to service management professionals but you know what I mean.  Hopefully forums like this one can restore some decorum.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/13&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/13#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/9">cult</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 18:55:50 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fads in IT</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/8</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT industry is certainly prone to its fads.  This is a reflection of the immaturity of the whole industry (as compared to say most branches of engineering.  You don’t see civil engineers coming up with cool new ways to build bridges every few years, especially not cool new ways that turn out to be more expensive and less safe than traditional techniques).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/8&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/8#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/9">cult</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 04:10:58 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">8 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is ITIL another Y2K?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/5</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;[This article has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/66&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There certainly are some strong similarities.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/5&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/5#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/114">classic Skeptic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/9">cult</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1">ITIL</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 04:16:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
