<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Crap Factoid Alerts: Strong Commitment to ITIL3, 72% trained, 94% planning, 89% predictable costs....&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alerts-strong-commitment-itil3-72-tra</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Crap Factoid Alerts: Strong Commitment to ITIL3, 72% trained, 94% planning, 89% predictable costs....&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Kudos to Sunrise</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alerts-strong-commitment-itil3-72-tra#comment-3767</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I want to say kudos to Stuart at Sunrise Software for actually responding to my questions and continuing a very open and much more frank conversation about the polarized project success in the UK with ITIL.  Much of what was reported in the survey was based upon ITIL V2.  I&#039;m not sure folks here in the US actually understand that the challenges they are facing now with absorbing ITIL V3 (yes even a year plus after launch) are echoed elsewhere, and especially in the UK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stuart explained how they see &#039;rushers&#039; and &#039;thinkers&#039; as projects.  The &#039;rushers&#039; those who want to implement ITIL all in one go as quickly as possible, often spurred on by vendors, consultants and generally those who will not suffer the consequences of a failure.  Typically these projects fail.  And... the &#039;thinkers&#039; - those who plan and phase their projects - as you might suspect these have much more success.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senior management please look away..... Another telling opinion is that more money is presumed lost in failed ITIL efforts overall, than benefits gained and stated.... hhmm.. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those who claim to know me this leads me back to what might sound like a familiar conclusion - ITIL is not the solution - its a contributor to a solution.  It is but one element and certificate centric consulting, or &#039;buy my tool because its associated with ITIL&#039; selling must be exposed for what it is - not playing with a full deck (of cards)...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ianclayton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3767 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More comment on the survey</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alerts-strong-commitment-itil3-72-tra#comment-3757</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;See Ian Clayton&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&amp;amp;gid=35247&amp;amp;discussionID=581914&amp;amp;commentID=740767#commentID_740767&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;comments on this on LinkedIn
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3757 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
