<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;The Pillars of ITIL&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/pillars-itil</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The Pillars of ITIL&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>True comments</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/pillars-itil#comment-3917</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;But at times it seems like it has all the structure of a house of cards.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tim.malone</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3917 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Some competition for Pink?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/pillars-itil#comment-3915</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Skep,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just found on the APMG site that they also provide some sort of product evaluation for tooling, never new that one before. Seems that Pink has got some competition. When you look at the APMG reports, it is quite funny realy. Descriptive and all, not too much SMART-ness is included. It seems to me that this does not fill in a gap that should be solved 10 years ago ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michiel&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michiel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3915 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
