<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Deep discounts for ITIL Live™&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/deep-discounts-itil-live</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Deep discounts for ITIL Live™&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>1964</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/deep-discounts-itil-live#comment-4395</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;OK I&#039;ll bite: what happened in 1964?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4395 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/deep-discounts-itil-live#comment-4394</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A Quote fromBlog entry submitted by skeptic  on Wed, 2009-04-01 20:42&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Well of course we need to test for all the requirements in the books. Anything less would be a subjective re-interpretation of the books by the standard&#039;s author. Since the standard is developed by a small group it is essential it be comprehensive to avoid claims that it is just opinion.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder where the world of tecnology would be if this had been the attitude in 1964.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ed Doran</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4394 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
