<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Are training providers experiencing a drop in certification pass rates since ITIL V3 Foundation syllabus was revised?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/are-training-providers-experiencing-drop-certifica</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Are training providers experiencing a drop in certification pass rates since ITIL V3 Foundation syllabus was revised?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Foundation syllabus woes</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/are-training-providers-experiencing-drop-certifica#comment-4887</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, we&#039;ve felt an impact in our classes.  Most seriously, there have been numerous reports by our students of questions on post-revision exams which fell outside the new syllabus.  Having trained many thousands of students, we have a relatively stabilized notion of what our pass rates should be, e.g. 97%.  This last round of exams (four classes in May) was markedly lower, e.g. 85%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My feeling is that quite a bit of maturation has yet to occur in the ITIL certification bureaucracy.  Exam quality is still substantially less than it should be.  Question wordiing is unnecessarily obtuse.  We&#039;ve seen repeat questions on exams.  The testing software used by the examiners has significant faults.  Post-exam feedback provided by some online examiners is incomplete.  There&#039;s no such thing as an adaptive ITIL exam yet.  Lots of work to do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We&#039;re taking countermeasures to ensure consistency in learning outcomes regardless of the air cover provided by the certification hierarchy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Stucky</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4887 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hard to tell yet but I think not</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/are-training-providers-experiencing-drop-certifica#comment-4877</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Skep, as you&#039;ve blogged already EXIN are suffering some &quot;teething problems&quot; so we&#039;ve only seen one set of results post 1st May. That was a 100% pass rate for a closed (single-company) course so perhaps not indicative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having read Ivanka&#039;s post, I&#039;d agree that some of there&#039;s a slight mismatch between syllabus and exam. I&#039;ve been told by two delegates that things which are supposedly now outside the syllabus came up in the exam.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Duncan&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Duncan Anderson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4877 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
