<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Is Knowledge Management a hole in COBIT?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/knowledge-management-hole-cobit</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Is Knowledge Management a hole in COBIT?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>You may work this way. For</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/knowledge-management-hole-cobit#comment-4940</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You may work this way. For KM goal as defined in Service Transition the most appropriate business goal I found it in COBIT is number 9, &quot;Obtain reliable and useful information for strategic decision making.&quot;. This maps to a lot of IT Goals 2 4 12 20 26 but 4 20 and 26 looks like more related to integrity and reliability of the information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because it trigers a lot of processes you might consider to group some of the similar activities under only one additional process - you might argue that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind that SKMS is at the &quot;best practice&quot; stage  - a concept which must prove that it is working in practice.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4940 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
