<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Acend Corporate Learning systematically plagiarises copyright content&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Acend Corporate Learning systematically plagiarises copyright content&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I feel your pain and I am so</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5700</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I feel your pain and I am so terribly sorry for what happened to you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5700 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Andrew Hunt of Acend seems incapable of original material</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5170</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m fascinated by this like the cleanup after a car smash, or a guy picking his nose in the row in front: you don&#039;t want to watch but you just can&#039;t stop yourself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hunt&#039;s blog is just an endless drone of ripped off plagiarism.  Look at this from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.backbonemag.com/Magazine/Big_Ideas_03310902.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Backbone Magazine back in March&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new government tax incentive means now is the time to buy &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stephen Harper’s January budget may have been born out of political necessity, but from that tumult came at least one business initiative of great value: a temporary measure that allows business taxpayers to fully write off computer investments. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The change centres on the Capital Cost Allowance (CCA), the percentage of a capital asset’s cost a business may deduct each year for tax purposes. Budget 2009 increases the CCA rate to 100 per cent for computer hardware and systems software acquired after January 27, 2009 and before February 1, 2011. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Previously, businesses could only write off 55 per cent of a technology investment, at a rate of 50 per cent per year. In subsequent years, the write off diminished as the remaining balance decreased. So the tax benefit, in the first year, was effectively 27.5 per cent of the total. If a company spent $10,000, it claimed $2,750 in the first year. The claim in the second year was based on the remaining balance of $7,250, and that amount diminished annually.&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Act now&lt;br /&gt;
This initiative delivers a direct benefit to Canadian businesses, said Peter Coles, a tax research and training specialist with H&amp;amp;R Block. “We are already advising clients to take advantage of this. For example, if a company is thinking of buying computers but had decided to hold off until after the recession, that is not a good decision. Business people should consider buying the equipment now.”&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.acend.com/bid/18877/INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY-Now-is-the-time-to-upgrade&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Hunt&#039;s latest Acend blog post&lt;/a&gt; where this time he rewrote the first paragraph, and deliberately turned a quote from &quot;Peter Coles, a tax research and training specialist with H&amp;amp;R Block&quot; into his own words&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new government tax incentive means now is the time to buy &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many have taken advantage of the Home Renovation Tax credit that Stephen Harper announced in January, not as many are aware that businesses will now be allowed a 100% Capital Cost Allowance for computers in the first year, and that this is a temporary two-year measure.  These budget changes may have come from political necessity, but from it comes at least one business initiative of great value. This temporary measure allows business taxpayers to fully write off computer investments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The change centres on the Capital Cost Allowance (CCA), the percentage of a capital asset&#039;s cost a business may deduct each year for tax purposes. Budget 2009 increases the CCA rate to 100 per cent for computer hardware and systems software acquired after January 27, 2009 and before February 1, 2011.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prior to this announcement, businesses could only write off 55 per cent of a technology investment, at a rate of 50 per cent per year. In subsequent years, the write-off diminished as the remaining balance decreased. So the tax benefit, in the first year, was effectively 27.5 per cent of the total. If a company spent $10,000, it claimed $2,750 in the first year. The claim in the second year was based on the remaining balance of $7,250, and that amount diminished annually. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...[several copied paragraphs here]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Act Now&lt;br /&gt;
If your company was thinking about buying new computers but had decided to hold off until after the recession, that is no longer a good decision.  Business people should consider buying software and equipment now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.acend.com/bid/18883/How-to-Choose-the-Right-IT-Training-Provider&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the post before that&lt;/a&gt; is ripped off &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insolvencyhelpline.co.uk/business_advice/employing_people/improving_performance/providers.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;from the British government&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yeah, nose-picker is about the right analogy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5170 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I had to remove a comment here</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5160</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I had to remove a comment here because it was potentially libellous.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It certainly indicated that Acend are not universally popular: &lt;em&gt; The biggest joke is the &quot;Acend going Green&quot;. [They] photocopy Microsoft Official Courseware and hand it out. Why??? The do not have to pay the $250 for the book. LOL&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I reiterate that these are not people I would do business  with.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5160 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Acend just keep using other people&#039;s content</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5076</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Compare &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.acend.com/bid/18632/Microsoft-Windows-7-Delivery-Timeline-Released&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this blog from July 25th&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Microsoft just release expected delivery dates of Windows 7 on a day that saw them change the product version to Ready To Manufacturer (RTM).  So what does this mean to you.  Here are some of the important dates to remember:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;August 6th ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;with &lt;a href=&quot;http://talesfromitside.wordpress.com/2009/07/23/windows-7-delivery-timeline-released/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Tales of the IT Side &lt;/a&gt; on July 23rd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Microsoft just release expected delivery dates of Windows 7 on a day that saw them change the product version to Ready To Manufacturer (RTM).  So what does this mean to you.  Here are some of the important dates to remember:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;August 6th ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tales from the IT Side is written by Don of New Horizons of Minnesota.  Acend were once part of New Horizons, so maybe Don and Andrew are mates.  Maybe Andrew just forgot to credit his old mate Don.  [Update: No he didn&#039;t.  Don didn&#039;t know, as if we hadn&#039;t guessed.  There is no copyright notice on the Tales from the IT Side blog so strictly this is mere plagiarism not copyright theft.  A link to the post has appeared on the Acend blog after I commented there (comment not published of course).]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you compare to what Andrew writes when he is being original, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.acend.com/bid/18631/My-Life-in-Computers-The-Andrew-Hunt-Story&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;My Life in Computers - The Andrew Hunt Story&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (no, really), perhaps you can understand why he borrows everyone else&#039;s stuff.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5076 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;m doing my bit</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5034</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...to spread the word.  I hope all readers will help.  Gotta get back to making a living now, by writing stuff so others can steal it&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5034 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>You need to spread the word</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5033</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Acend recently won a bid to deliver ITIL training for the City of Toronto, I am tempted to forward your blog post to the city councilors and ask them if they are still happy with their decision...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5033 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Acend CONTINUE to rip off material, unattributed!</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5031</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;These guys just can&#039;t help themselves.  Even though they cleaned up their blog, one of the remaining articles is still ripped off!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.acend.com/Blog/bid/17547/5-Beliefs-that-Limit-Productivity&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Andrew Hunt&#039;s post of 13th July&lt;/a&gt;, unattributed to anyone else.  &quot;During my conversations with people over the past few weeks, when I&#039;ve asked ...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Compare to &lt;a href=&quot;http://community.crn.com/blogs/insideball/2009/07/02/windows-7-in-the-enterprise-go-or-no&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this comment by Ed Molson&lt;/a&gt; on 2nd July. &quot;During my conversations with people over the past few weeks, when I&#039;ve asked ...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just unbelievable.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5031 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>cease and desist</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5025</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I know of three parties who have referred the matter to their lawyers, but I wonder if it will not get past &quot;cease and desist &quot; letters.  i actually prefer this way.  Do a google on &quot;Acend&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5025 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>legal action</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5024</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll repeat here what I said on Twitter. Legal action strongly suggested!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know about the difficulties.  I also know the practice is despicable!  Your blog post, while it draws limited attention to the subject, does nothing to curb the practice.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the very least, have a conversation with a lawyer.  It is not an impossibility.  Consider the following Seabeas motto: &quot;The difficult we do immediately. The impossible just takes a little longer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Moskowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5024 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Several other articles on</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5017</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Several other articles on this web site are plagiarized.  I sent a note to the authors of the &quot;CIO’s guide to ITIL in the Midmarket&quot; article and the &quot;How to Market Training to Your Workforce&quot; article.  Both articles omit the names of the author.  This is plain and simple theft.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jan Vromant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5017 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>sucks</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-5000</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;especially the &quot;we gave you grudging credit with a vague link to the homepage not the actual article, no reference to the author, no acknowldgement of original copyright, after you complained we had not right to the material&quot; defence.  That REALLY sucks.  it shows an utter contempt for other people&#039;s intellectual property rights&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5000 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The thing that kills me about this...</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/acend-systematically-plagiarises-copyright-content#comment-4999</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...is this idea that a link or a shout-out excuses the copyright infringement. Yeah, and I can crank out copies of Acend training materials too, as long as I tell everyone where they came from. Not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know you said this too, but the &quot;we gave you credit&quot; defense soooo gets under my skin. Arrrrgh.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark W. Schumann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4999 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
