<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;SO 4.2 Incident Management process never determines the service&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/so-42-incident-management-process-never-determines</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;SO 4.2 Incident Management process never determines the service&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Not only isn&#039;t service</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/so-42-incident-management-process-never-determines#comment-5204</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not only isn&#039;t service impact analysis mentioned, by any name, but almost the only mention of a service anywhere in 4.2 is in the definition of an incident (“…an unplanned interruption to an IT service…”)  and in broad terms in 4.2.1 and 4.2.2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s see.&lt;br /&gt;
4.2.5.1 Incidnet indentification&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;all key components should be monitored&quot; - much more important is monioting the service level, the end-user experience.  No mention&lt;br /&gt;
4.2.5.2 incident logging&lt;br /&gt;
19 different attributes of an incident, none of them is the affected service&lt;br /&gt;
4.2.5.3 categorisation&lt;br /&gt;
by &#039;hardware&#039; or &quot;software&quot; but not service&lt;br /&gt;
4.2.5.4 prioritization&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;indication of impact is often... number of users affected&quot; Note &quot;loss of service&quot; is a general term, it is not referring to THE service.&lt;br /&gt;
Hey there is a mention of service!  Apparently &quot;the number of services affected&quot; contributes ot impact, but not what the services are.&lt;br /&gt;
Talk of LSA targets to be met, but no mention that we need to find out the service to know what SLA.&lt;br /&gt;
4.2.5.5 diagnosis&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;what has gone wrong&quot; no mention of service.&lt;br /&gt;
4.2.5.6 escalation&lt;br /&gt;
no service&lt;br /&gt;
4.2.5.7 investigation and diagnosis&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;full impact of the incident&quot; no mwention of service&lt;br /&gt;
4.2.5.8 resolution and recovery&lt;br /&gt;
Yay &quot;...that the service has been fully restored to the user&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
4.2.5.9 closure&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;check categorisation&quot; is correct but apparently don&#039;t need to check that incident is recorded against correct service(s)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So OK the word &quot;service&quot; cropped up a couple of times.  but there is NO mention of SIA, no CMS, and no service catalogue anywhere in the activiites.  CMS does show up in 4.2.7 to &quot;identify the CIs affected&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4.2.8 metrics&lt;br /&gt;
apparently we don&#039;t need to measure incidents by service&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5204 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I think SIA got renamed in</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/so-42-incident-management-process-never-determines#comment-5202</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think SIA got renamed in V3. That might explain why you can&#039;t find it. Have to consult my notes though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>riCh chestMat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5202 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
