<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;itSMF International Seeking Publications Partner  &quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsmf-international-seeking-publications-partner</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;itSMF International Seeking Publications Partner  &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>itSMFI acquires itSMF trademark</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsmf-international-seeking-publications-partner#comment-5393</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry should have linked.  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmfi.org/content/itsmf-trademark-agreement&quot; tareget=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  I know nuzzink!  (...that I can share).  Let&#039;s just say the centre of mass of itSMF seems to me to be slowly drifting westwards.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5393 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>itSMF Brand</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsmf-international-seeking-publications-partner#comment-5392</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You make an interesting statement here about itSMFI prying the itSMF brand from the UK&#039;s grasp.  Is there any more information on this?  And where can I find it? Is the brand now going to be open to abuse and left unprotected because of this?  Let&#039;s face it, itSMFI&#039;s past record of delivery has not been good at the best of times!  What are itSMFI&#039;s plans for the future on this?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5392 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>a legacy for the new Board</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsmf-international-seeking-publications-partner#comment-5308</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One hopes the final decision of appointing a new publisher will be left to the new Board to make.  It is hardly best practice for an outgoing Board to make a decision of this magnitude.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5308 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
