<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Chalk and Cheese continued: ISACA vs itSMF&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Chalk and Cheese continued: ISACA vs itSMF&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Translations of ITSM books</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf#comment-6520</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I guess communication is probably the issue for the translations that have been done through the itSMFI translation contract....&lt;br /&gt;
5 core books in Japanese&lt;br /&gt;
5 core books in German&lt;br /&gt;
Official intro and 3 core books in French&lt;br /&gt;
5 core books in Spanish publishing this month&lt;br /&gt;
Foundation Handbook in Danish&lt;br /&gt;
Foundation Handbook in Japanese&lt;br /&gt;
Foundation Handbook in Arabic publishing in March&lt;br /&gt;
Foundation Handbook in Swedish publishing in April&lt;br /&gt;
5 core books in Portuguese publishing in late May&lt;br /&gt;
2 more translations coming later this year in Japanese&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several other translations are under negotiation currently, so there will be more to add to the list in the coming months&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So we haven&#039;t been sitting on our hands....the strategy for itSMF publishing has taken quite a bit of work, and the commercially sensitive nature of the negotiations to get this sorted have meant that we haven&#039;t been able to make much of that public, but watch out for some exciting publications due out in the middle of this year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;br /&gt;
Kirstie Magowan&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Editor&lt;br /&gt;
itSMF International&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 08:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kirstie Magowan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6520 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Link to ISACA virtual conf</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf#comment-6396</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Press release&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isaca.org/Template.cfm?Section=Press_Releases1&amp;amp;CONTENTID=52853&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&quot; title=&quot;http://www.isaca.org/Template.cfm?Section=Press_Releases1&amp;amp;CONTENTID=52853&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.isaca.org/Template.cfm?Section=Press_Releases1&amp;amp;CONTENTID=5285...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charles T. Betz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.erp4it.com&quot; title=&quot;http://www.erp4it.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.erp4it.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles T. Betz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6396 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>efficient and effective</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf#comment-6394</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ISACA has also done a lot for me locally which I have not listed in that original post.  At an international level, ISACA does more.  I may have missed some translations but may i point out those are a service itSMFI has signed a contract with TSO to produce: I&#039;m not clear on whether itSMF is going to get paid for that? (it cost us money in 2009, the only record of payment in the accounts is for a thousand pounds which would hardly seem to cover the translations so far)  If we are not then questions should be asked because TSO will sell the books for a profit and OGC will collect royalties.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is true that ISACA own COBIT.  I get it for free, all of it including the equivalent of the complementary publications, plus VAL IT, plus RISK IT, plus large amounts of additional IP, as part of my annual hundred and thirty bucks.  i don&#039;t get stung an additional five hundred every time I want a copy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is NOT just an issue of communication.  ISACA is efficient and effective, itSMF isn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6394 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>itSMF Annual report</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf#comment-6393</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re right, the Annual Report was difficult to find and is a good thing for people to see! It is now here:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;www.itsmf.com&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and on twitter....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peter Brooks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6393 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Additional comments</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf#comment-6390</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Just to clarify what might not have been clear : I agree with the point that you don&#039;t get the same value from the money spent with the itSMF than with ISACA, but the points you use to prove it are not the good ones, thus my first comment. Your first post in 2008 (http://www.itskeptic.org/node/433) was much better in that respect. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Philippe,&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Philippe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6390 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>German itSMF</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf#comment-6389</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Philippe,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Germany 5 books were translated, a book for ITSM in the public sector was published, approx. 10 regional forums met regularly, next to the main yearly conference several meetings were held, ~8 work groups adressed a lot of topics and more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The itSMF is just lousy in communications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;
Marc - &lt;a href=&quot;http://buzina.Wordpress.com&quot; title=&quot;http://buzina.Wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://buzina.Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mbuzina</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6389 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More details</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf#comment-6388</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Skep, I usually like your posts, but in this case i disagree with you. This post is both inaccurate and misleading. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inaccurate :&lt;br /&gt;
As of today, there are 4 books available in French : Introduction has been published in 2008, SO, ST and SD have been published in 2009. It&#039;s been done with contributions from France, Canada, Switzerland and Belgium, so it is really an international operation.&lt;br /&gt;
The detailed list of translations is here : http://www.best-management-practice.com/Publications-Library/Translations/&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t know when the German, Japanese or Korean versions have been published but I guess some of them were in 2009. That&#039;s definitely more than just 2. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Misleading :&lt;br /&gt;
There is a major difference between ISACA and itSMF : ISACA Owns Cobit, whereas itSMF&#039;s self attributed mission is to promote ITIL, not own it. So you if you want to compare equivalent elements, you should compare ISACA and OGC. OGC did a lot of things, sometimes controversial, but you can&#039;t suggest they&#039;ve been inactive. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, itSMF International is not itSMF. See http://www.itsmfi.org/view/eventpageview - Lots of things going on all over the world. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And there are a lot of things going on at the country level that are not even mentionned on the itSMF page. I know at least about meetings in Geneva (Switzerland) in December, Nantes (France) in February, Grenoble (France) in March, just to name a few outside of UK. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe itSMFi is just not as good as ISACA to take credit of their member&#039;s activities. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Philippe, no song this time&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Philippe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6388 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>virtual conf</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf#comment-6387</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Which one&#039;s that Charles?  The UK run monthly webinars that are reportedly good.  (I&#039;m a reader not a listener so i never get time for webinars or podcasts).  Or was this a USA thing?  or International?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6387 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Virtual conference</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/chalk-and-cheese-continued-isaca-vs-itsmf#comment-6386</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I attended the virtual conference. Some tech glitches but generally well done, and the presentations were top notch. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charles T. Betz&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.erp4it.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles T. Betz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6386 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
