<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;ITIL v3 Process Maps&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;ITIL v3 Process Maps&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fair Process</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995#comment-7829</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Besides Kotter&#039;s change structure, we&#039;ve found that the approach suggested by Fair Process - Kim and Mauborgne in HBR (2002) - works very well indeed.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We focus on eliciting Why statements from management and staff so that they develop their own motivations - which tends to overcome the fear and status quo bias that prevails.  People don&#039;t mind change, but they really hate being changed.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We use ITIL and other standards as guides.  We are, sometimes, invited in after the initial itilization failed because of focus on process instead of execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are increasingly finding that a simultaneous focus on financial transparency and service budgeting helps - because it helps to include the rest of the business and moves towards an outside-in focus instead of the inside-only focus.  An adaptation of Dean Meyer&#039;s materials and Ian Clayton&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have fun in Las Vegas.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CaryKing</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7829 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Case studies</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995#comment-7828</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have a few :)  Start with this one which is salient to your comment, Cary: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pinkelephant.com/index.php?/conference/comments/a_tale_of_two_leaders/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;A Tale of Two Leaders&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7828 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Won&#039;t your vendor just give you those for free?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995#comment-7827</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that, if you&#039;re simply trying to implement according to a view of ITIL, you should consider using the one the vendor provides.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That way your practices will totally align with the software you spent so much on.&lt;br /&gt;
The vendor no doubt spent a lot of money to get their software &quot;certified&quot; by someone, else you wouldn&#039;t have bought it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just do what they say and quick as a bunny, Bob&#039;s your uncle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Getting your people to consistently execute on those processes is likely to be an issue.  But, your processes are all done - you are ITIL-ized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d love to read a case study on this....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cary&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CaryKing</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7827 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Same process for everyone?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1995#comment-7826</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The faulty assumption here is that there is one set of processes that can be &quot;derived&quot; from ITIL that applies to every organisation. These would perhaps be useful as inspiration in defining processes specific to your organisation, but it&#039;d almost certainly be a bad idea to take them and plonk them into any organisation without thinking about whether they&#039;re a good fit or not. Buying these and using them as-is would be bypassing the &quot;strategy&quot; part of ITSM.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stewart M Johnson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7826 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
