<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;&amp;amp;quot;ITIL 2011&amp;amp;quot; will replace &amp;amp;quot;ITIL 2007&amp;amp;quot; on 29 July 2011. V3 is dead, long live V3&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-will-replace-itil-2007-29-july-2011-v3-d</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;&quot;ITIL 2011&quot; will replace &quot;ITIL 2007&quot; on 29 July 2011. V3 is dead, long live V3&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ITIL Edition 2011: Stumbling to an outside-in view?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-will-replace-itil-2007-29-july-2011-v3-d#comment-8228</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Well I read the FAQ and it reads like there are no new concepts, but then again there are.  The qualifications won&#039;t be affected, but then again they are.  The syllabus will change in proportion to allow the lesson units to be synchronized with the restructured content, which includes &quot;some new content&quot;, and a new sylabus is due out August 8.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A previous note from TSO did clearly suggest that although certificates will be unaffected and no &#039;upgrade&#039; required, the date (or edition) will become relevant.  Frankly, given the &#039;fixing&#039; of Service Strategy, I think it could bring every cert above and beyond Foundation into the frame - and EVERY candidate who has sat the Intermediate and Expert levels should somehow ensure they are up to date!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The changes spelled out to Strategy in the FAQ support the claim by some (may I quote Glenn O&#039;Donnell here of Forrester), that ITIL is indeed &#039;inside-out&#039; and my long standing belief it is still learning how to help IT folks think and act customer first (outside-in).  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Universal-Service-Management-Knowledge-USMBOK/product-reviews/0981469108/ref=sr_1_1_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;showViewpoints=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Glenn&#039;s full statement is here&lt;/a&gt; as part of his review of the Guide to USMBOK&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ianclayton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8228 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The usual chaos in Castle ITIL.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-2011-will-replace-itil-2007-29-july-2011-v3-d#comment-8227</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A TSO elert and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmf.co.uk/News/General/ITIL_2011_Edition.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;post on itSMFUK&lt;/a&gt;.  Castle ITIL flings information over the wall like turds.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8227 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
