<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;A special case crap factoid: the survey that doesn&amp;amp;#039;t exist&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/special-case-crap-factoid-survey-doesnt-exist</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;A special case crap factoid: the survey that doesn&#039;t exist&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I am waiting...</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/special-case-crap-factoid-survey-doesnt-exist#comment-8366</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;for the first survey which proves what amazing ROI companies have received after implementing the ITIL V3 2011 Edition. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or maybe I should write it using this Rob England -survey method. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aale&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aroos</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8366 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>press releases as a business</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/special-case-crap-factoid-survey-doesnt-exist#comment-8322</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not a secret that any company who wants to get good PR should outsource these tasks for some thousand bucks a year to someone focused on strategy consulting, competitive intelligence or something like so called decision support.&lt;br /&gt;
You give them a theme, topic or message and they deal with it in a way as a REAL service provider.&lt;br /&gt;
So you should always question these kind of results, but you will never get the sources, references..thats their own business model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nice watch out, Skep..in the end its always making money, no matter who cares for the results...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jol</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8322 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What to look for in research</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/special-case-crap-factoid-survey-doesnt-exist#comment-8315</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What to look for in research &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/544&quot; title=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/544&quot;&gt;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/544&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8315 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Survey and Statistics...</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/special-case-crap-factoid-survey-doesnt-exist#comment-8314</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t it time that all the surveys and statistical information (X% believe....) should now have details any decent statistics or survey should have such as population, smaple and significance etc. Folks who study Statistics as a subject for University degree must be laughing at these. It could even be research topic, how many of all IT surverys are true to what they say. Axios is just one example, every day so many &quot;crap factoids&quot; are released, I am sure Chokey the Chimp must be having a busy time. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;C&#039;mon people let us not undervalue the science of statistics (or surveys or primary research) so much that it can only be called an art (a.k.a. creativity at its best).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sid&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8314 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
