<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Somebody spat the dummy at itSMF International&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/somebody-spat-dummy-itsmf-international</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Somebody spat the dummy at itSMF International&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Spat the Dummy?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/somebody-spat-dummy-itsmf-international#comment-8902</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I almost fell out of my chair when I came to the realization as to why Australians call a pacifier a &quot;dummy&quot;!  (...which only hit me as I got to the end of the article!)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Talk about enlightenment!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My Best,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Frank&lt;br /&gt;
--&lt;br /&gt;
Frank Guerino, Chairman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.if4it.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The International Foundation for&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.if4it.com/SYNTHESIZED/GLOSSARY/I/Information_Technology_IT.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Information Technology&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.if4it.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IF4IT&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>guerino1</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8902 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>drawing attention</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/somebody-spat-dummy-itsmf-international#comment-8889</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Im glad I have drawn attention.  Hushing things up just lets them continue to be destructive whereas a little transparency here might help flush this idiot out and make them back their claims.  That ought to result in public humiliation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unless of course there is something to it....  the cronyism that is, not the publishing.  As you say that is a function of itsmf to contribute to the body of knowledge.  Whining about it only further damages their credibility.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I hear they have taken my advice and started promoting the petition via email.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8889 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I suspect you have just</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/somebody-spat-dummy-itsmf-international#comment-8885</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I suspect you have just drawn more attention to this than it has ever had before. The libel laws prevent too much speculation as to the originator but I know where I would bet my money - lots of history and I recognise the style :).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The petition has had all the signatures it deserves - one at the last count.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the things that makes me want to actually comment is the - to me - amazing phrase &quot;degenerated into almost a publishing house &quot;. itSMF: intentional, chapter and local is and needs to be a range of things. As a long time proponent of relevant publishing I couldn&#039;t get past the use of the word &#039;degenerated&#039; as if publishing is the last resort of the shameful  infidel. To me publishing is something we should be proud of - what a strange attitude from an &#039;itsmf member&#039; to be anti-publishing!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ivormacfarlane</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8885 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
