<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Governors govern&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/governors-govern</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Governors govern&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Governance is a feedback</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/governors-govern#comment-9396</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Governance is a feedback loop: direct, monitor, evaluate.  But it is not the only feedback loop nor even the primary one.  There are much tighter PDCA loops in management&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9396 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Have a Beer? </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/governors-govern#comment-9395</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Rob, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think of this Stafford Beer video as commentary on your governance definition? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://t.co/NxY6raPY&quot; title=&quot;http://t.co/NxY6raPY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://t.co/NxY6raPY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charlie&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles T. Betz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9395 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>governance enablement</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/governors-govern#comment-9387</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At some point down the delegation chain we cease tpo be doing governance, even delegated governance.  hence my scorn of references to &quot;SharePoint governance&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At some level, governance turns into what I call &quot;governance enablement&quot; or &quot;plug and socket&quot;: doing the stuff to meet the requirements of governance:&lt;br /&gt;
- being directed: accepting and enforcing policy instead of setting it&lt;br /&gt;
- being monitored: providing the reporting data back to governance&lt;br /&gt;
- being evaluated: providing proposals and reports and being reviewed&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9387 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>makes sense to me.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/governors-govern#comment-9385</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Amongst other things, I&#039;m &quot;owner&quot; of some ITSM processes.  I guess this means I have delegated governance responsibility with my boss ultimately accountable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I set &amp;amp; periodically review progress against some performance targets, try to remove cultural obstacles, approve the CSI roadmap(s) &amp;amp; prioritise what&#039;s in them.  Process managers manage the work day-to-day and I try to mostly keep out of their way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far so good.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 07:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Rankin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9385 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
