<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;The purpose of SACM&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/291</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The purpose of SACM&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Poor wording</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/291#comment-2166</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The wording is indeed poor, but there are at least 2, if not 3, distinct points here:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bullet 1: these are, of course, the main activities of the process that we already saw in ITIL 3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bullet 2 &amp;amp; 3: They are indeed hard to distinguish, unless some text has fallen out from bullet 3 (but how are we to know that!). I understand Bullet 2 as being a detail of the activity Control, already in Bullet 1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bullet 4: The real point is about the CMS, and repeating the integrity business does not enhance the clarity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robert Falkowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2166 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
