<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;the new name for Configuration Management, SACM &quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/509</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;the new name for Configuration Management, SACM &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I believe this is incorrect</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/509#comment-2474</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I believe this is incorrect: the glossaries say &quot;Configuration Management is part of an overall Service Asset and Configuration Management Process&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is not easy to identify a clearly delineated Configuration Management within the SACM chapter of &lt;em&gt;Service Transition&lt;/em&gt; so I suspect it is a cover-up definition to clean up from changing the name in mid-stride, but it is nevertheless an out.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2474 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
